AMREP sold no developed land at all in its quarter ended July 31, 2026, cutting revenue 66% to $6.1 million and turning $6.1 million of prior-year operating income into a $163,000 loss — a deliberate shift of capital from high-margin land sales into homebuilding.
Land sales went to near zero, and that was the whole quarter
AMREP Corporation (NYSE: AXR) reported revenue of $6.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2026 — down 66% from $17.9 million a year earlier — and a small operating loss of $163,000 against $6.1 million of operating income in the same quarter last year. Net income fell 94%, to $276,000 or $0.05 per diluted share, from $4.7 million or $0.87.
Almost all of that swing sits in one line. AMREP sold no developed land at all this quarter. In the year-ago quarter it sold 8.9 developed acres — 5.6 residential and 3.3 commercial — for $5.2 million, at gross margins the company put at 69%. This quarter it sold 27.9 acres of undeveloped land for $173,000 total. Land sale revenue fell 98%.
A note on the calendar. AMREP's fiscal year ends April 30, so the quarter covered here — May 1 to July 31, 2026 — is the company's own fiscal 2027 first quarter. This site files it under calendar Q3 2026 because that is where the period ends. Where the filing says "2027," it means the fiscal year ending April 30, 2027.
AMREP is a small land developer and homebuilder operating almost entirely in and around Rio Rancho, New Mexico. It buys and entitles raw land, installs roads, water and utilities, then either sells the finished lots to other builders or builds houses on them itself. Revenue therefore arrives in irregular chunks — closing one large parcel can make or break a quarter — which is exactly what happened here, in reverse.
Read 0 community reports on AMREP Corporation, or write your own.Write a report
$7.49M
−98%
Home sale revenue
$4.88M
$9.57M
−49%
Other revenue (landscaping, HOA fees, rents)
$1.00M
$0.79M
+27%
Gross profit
$2.25M
$7.99M
−72%
Gross margin
37.1%
44.8%
−7.7 pts
Operating income (loss)
−$0.16M
$6.15M
n/m
Operating margin
−2.7%
34.4%
−37.1 pts
Net income
$0.28M
$4.69M
−94%
Diluted EPS
$0.05
$0.87
−94%
Acres of land sold
27.9
495.0
−94%
— of which developed acres
0.0
8.9
−100%
Average revenue per acre sold
~$6,200
~$15,100
−59%
Homes sold
12
22
−45%
Average home selling price
$407,000
$434,000
−6%
Home sale gross margin
23%
25%
−2 pts
Gross margin here is revenue minus cost of revenue, divided by revenue — the share of each sales dollar left after the direct cost of the land or house sold, before overhead. Operating margin is what's left after overhead too, but before interest and tax.
The negative cost line, and why the gross margin is misleading
Land sale cost of revenues came in at negative $400,000. That is not a typo in the filing: gross land cost of revenue was only $26,000, against which AMREP netted $374,000 of public improvement district reimbursements and $52,000 of private infrastructure covenant reimbursements.
Those reimbursements are how AMREP recovers infrastructure spending. When it builds roads, drainage and utilities for a subdivision, a special assessment is placed on the properties there, and the money collected flows back to AMREP over time to offset development costs it already incurred. Because the company recognizes those recoveries against current-period land cost, a quarter with almost no land sales but ongoing reimbursement collections produces a negative cost line.
The practical effect: the 37.1% consolidated gross margin above is flattered by a credit that has nothing to do with this quarter's selling activity. Management itself declined to state a land gross margin, calling it "not meaningful." Strip the land segment out and what's left is a homebuilding business running at a 23% gross margin — down from 25%, which management attributes to the location, size and mix of homes sold, plus higher sales incentives to buyers and higher prices for building materials and skilled labor.
Homebuilding: fewer and cheaper closings, but a larger pipeline
Home sale revenue fell 49%, driven mostly by volume: 12 homes closed versus 22. Average selling price slipped 6% to $407,000, which management puts down to the mix of homes sold rather than broad price cutting — though the explicit mention of "increases in the amount of sales incentives to homebuyers" as a margin drag says discounting is happening at the closing table even where the headline price holds.
The forward-looking picture is better than the closings suggest:
Jul 31, 2026
Jul 31, 2025
Homes in production
83
62
Homes under contract (backlog)
23
24
Contracted revenue when closed
$12.5M
$11.5M
Homes in production are up 34% year over year, and the balance sheet corroborates it: homebuilding construction in process rose 79% in three months, from $3.0 million at April 30 to $5.4 million at July 31, while finished-and-unsold model inventory fell 28% to $6.3 million. AMREP is putting capital into starts, not sitting on completed spec houses. Backlog value is up 9% on one fewer contract, implying a higher-priced mix waiting to close.
One caution on that pipeline: 83 homes in production against 23 under contract means roughly 60 houses being built without a buyer yet attached. That is a deliberate bet on absorption, and it is where the risk sits if demand softens further.
A related tell is that AMREP now leases out 30 completed homes to residential tenants, up from 28 at April 30. The filing is blunt about why: "Given the impact on demand as a result of affordability challenges, the Company has opportunistically leased completed homes." Owned real estate leased or intended to be leased rose 25% in the quarter, to $10.0 million gross. Renting finished inventory is a reasonable way to avoid dumping it at a discount, but it is a symptom of houses not clearing, not a new business line.
Costs rose into a shrinking revenue base
General and administrative expense — corporate and divisional overhead — rose 30% to $2.4 million while revenue fell 66%. That combination is what turned a positive gross profit into an operating loss.
G&A by segment
FY27 Q1
FY26 Q1
Change
Land development
$1.41M
$0.99M
+43%
Homebuilding
$0.51M
$0.45M
+15%
Corporate
$0.49M
$0.41M
+18%
Total
$2.41M
$1.85M
+30%
The 43% jump in land development G&A is partly a one-off. In June 2026, AMREP terminated two agreements under which it shared a portion of the private infrastructure covenant assessments it collects on two projects with TV Investments, LLC, paying $201,000 and $114,000 — $315,000 in total — to end them. TVI is 50% owned by an entity wholly owned by Timothy S. McNaney, who joined AMREP's board in January 2026; $157,500 of the payments represented his interest. The filing states McNaney was not involved in negotiating the terminations and that the board's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, of which he is not a member, reviewed and approved them.
Economically this is a buyout, not a recurring expense: AMREP paid once to stop sharing future assessment collections on those projects, which should flow entirely to it going forward. Excluding it, G&A would have been roughly $2.09 million, up about 13% — with the remainder from higher real estate taxes and depreciation in land development, payroll, benefits and marketing in homebuilding, and compensation, professional services and director fees at corporate.
Below the line
Net interest income was essentially flat at $448,000 versus $456,000 — this is interest earned on AMREP's own cash, not borrowing cost, and at this revenue level it is what kept the quarter in the black. Without it, pretax income of $285,000 would have been a $163,000 loss.
The tax provision was $9,000, an effective rate of roughly 3%, against 28.9% a year ago. The filing offers no explanation beyond "related to the amount of income before income taxes during each period," and the $9,000 exactly matches the quarter's decline in net deferred tax assets. On a pretax base this small, ordinary permanent differences swing the rate around; the dollar effect is about $73,000 of net income, or under a penny per share, so it does not change the read on the quarter.
There were no impairment charges on real estate inventory or investment assets in either period — worth noting, since a land developer writing down inventory is the usual next step when a downturn deepens. AMREP hasn't had to.
Balance sheet: the reason a bad quarter isn't a problem
Jul 31, 2026
Apr 30, 2026
Cash, equivalents and restricted cash
$49.05M
$52.69M
— of which US government securities
$38.87M
$38.53M
Real estate inventory
$68.89M
$66.56M
Investment assets, net
$18.11M
$16.17M
Total assets
$145.66M
$144.88M
Total liabilities
$4.55M
$4.14M
Shareholders' equity
$141.11M
$140.74M
Total debt is $17,000 — an equipment loan, nearly paid off. The revolving credit line with BOKF carried nothing outstanding at quarter end, with $6.1 million available to draw at 6.83%, maturing August 2028. Against $145.7 million of assets, AMREP has $4.5 million of liabilities in total, most of it trade payables and customer deposits.
Equity of $141.1 million across 5,324,849 shares outstanding works out to about $26.50 per share of book value, of which roughly $9.21 per share is cash and government securities.
Cash did decline $3.6 million in the quarter, with operating cash flow of −$3.6 million versus +$9.5 million a year ago. That is consistent with the inventory build rather than with losses: land inventory rose $2.3 million and construction in process $2.4 million. AMREP spent the quarter converting cash into houses and lots. With effectively no debt service, it can run negative operating cash flow like this for a long time before it matters.
Takeaway: This was not a demand collapse — it was the scheduled consequence of a strategy change. AMREP is deliberately shrinking the high-margin developed-land sales that have carried its earnings and redeploying the capital into homebuilding, which earns roughly a 23% gross margin instead of 69%. Even if the homebuilding pivot works exactly as intended, reported earnings should be structurally lower and less lumpy than the FY2025–26 period investors are comparing against. The right question for the next several quarters is how fast 83 homes in production convert to closings, not whether land revenue recovers.
Outlook
Management gave one explicit forward-looking statement, and it is not encouraging for the near-term revenue line. Because AMREP is "reducing the number and scope of its active land development projects and delaying certain new land development projects due to market headwinds and uncertainty," has "a more intentional focus on growing the homebuilding business segment," and saw "an increase in entitlement, contractor and infrastructure delays" in fiscal 2026, it "expects significantly reduced revenues from the sale of developed residential land during 2027" — that is, through April 2027. No revenue, margin or earnings guidance was given, which is normal for AMREP; it does not hold earnings calls or issue numeric forecasts.
Two other items shape the coming quarters:
Landscaping is gone. AMREP ceased providing landscaping services in August 2026, after quarter end. Landscaping was $711,000 of this quarter's $997,000 of other revenue, at roughly $431,000 of cost — so about $280,000 of quarterly gross profit disappears from fiscal Q2 onward. Small in absolute terms, but it removes most of the growth in the one revenue line that grew this quarter.
Customer concentration is easing as the mix shifts. One customer accounted for over 10% of revenue in each period, but the nature changed: $724,000 in homebuilding this quarter versus $2.5 million in land development a year ago, when a substantial majority of land sale revenue came from just three buyers. Selling houses to individuals is inherently less concentrated than selling parcels to a handful of builders.
My read: the next two to three quarters should look weak on the revenue line by design, with earnings hovering near breakeven and interest income on the $49 million cash pile doing a disproportionate share of the work. The signal to watch is not quarterly revenue — it will stay lumpy and management has effectively pre-announced that land sales will be thin — but whether homes in production keep rising while homes under contract does not. Backlog held roughly flat this quarter (23 versus 24 contracts) while production capacity grew 34%. If that gap widens for another quarter or two, AMREP is building into weak absorption, and the leasing-out-completed-homes workaround will grow with it. If backlog starts converting, the homebuilding segment's $490,000 of quarterly profit has real room to scale. The balance sheet — no meaningful debt, $141 million of equity, no impairments taken — means the company gets time to find out either way.
Source: AMREP Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on September 11, 2026 (CIK 0000006207). All figures are unaudited and as reported.