Freight price inflation lifted C.H. Robinson revenue 19.3% to $4.93B, but adjusted gross profit rose only 6.5%; 10.8% lower headcount drove an 18.4% rise in operating income and a 23.8% gain in EPS to $1.56.
Revenue
$4.9B
+19.3% YoY
Net income
$187M
+22.5% YoY
Diluted EPS
$1.56
+23.8% YoY
Operating margin
5.2%
Overview
C.H. Robinson's revenue jumped 19.3% to $4.93 billion in the second quarter of 2026 (three months ended June 30). That rise mostly reflects higher freight prices, not more business. A tight North American trucking market and Middle East disruptions to ocean and air shipping raised the rates the company charges. They raised the rates it pays carriers just as fast, and in truckload a bit faster. The better guide to the business, adjusted gross profit, grew a more modest 6.5% to $738.0 million. Operating income still rose 18.4% to $255.7 million because the company did the work with 10.8% fewer employees on average (11,471 vs. 12,858). Net income rose 22.5% to $186.8 million and diluted EPS rose 23.8% to $1.56.
Why revenue is the wrong number to watch for a freight broker
C.H. Robinson mostly doesn't own trucks, ships or planes. It sells a shipment to a customer, hires a carrier to move it and keeps the difference. When trucking rates rise 25%, both what the customer pays and what the carrier gets go up. Revenue swells, but the company's cut may barely move. The number that measures its actual earnings is adjusted gross profit: total revenue minus what it pays carriers ("purchased transportation") and minus the cost of produce it resells (in the filing's terms, gross profit before amortization of customer-facing software). This quarter the gap is clear. Revenue grew 19.3% but adjusted gross profit grew only 6.5%. The company's share of each revenue dollar, its adjusted gross profit margin, fell from 16.8% to 15.0%. That fall reflects inflated freight prices passing through the income statement, not weaker results.
For the same reason, the company's preferred profitability measure is adjusted operating margin: operating income divided by adjusted gross profit, i.e. how much of what it actually keeps survives payroll and overhead. That measure rose 360 basis points to 34.7% (a basis point is 0.01 percentage point). The ordinary operating margin on revenue was flat at 5.2%, held down by the larger pass-through revenue.
Key metrics — Q2 2026
Metric
Q2 2026
Read 0 community reports on C.H. Robinson, or write your own.Write a report
Adjusted operating margin (op. income ÷ adj. gross profit)
34.7%
31.1%
+3.6 pp
Net income
$186.8M
$152.5M
+22.5%
Diluted EPS
$1.56
$1.26
+23.8%
Average employee headcount
11,471
12,858
−10.8%
NAST truckload + LTL volume
—
—
≈+1.5%
First half (six months to June 30): revenue $8,947.0M (+9.3%), adjusted gross profit $1,398.5M (+2.4%), operating income $431.4M (+9.8%), adjusted operating margin 30.9% (vs. 28.7%), net income $334.0M (+16.1%), diluted EPS $2.78 (+17.3%). Average headcount was down 11.9%.
The trucking squeeze: costs rose faster than prices
The filing describes a North American truckload market that "continued to tighten". Carrier capacity shrank because regulatory enforcement cut driver availability and operating costs stayed high. The filing says this supply squeeze, "rather than a meaningful recovery in underlying freight demand", drove rates up. Industry freight volumes, as measured by the Cass Freight Index, fell 3.3% year over year. Diesel prices hit multi-year highs during the quarter because of Middle East tensions.
For C.H. Robinson that meant:
Truckload cost per mile paid to carriers (excluding fuel surcharges) rose about 29.0%, while the rate per mile charged to customers rose about 25.5%. In the first half the figures were +21.5% and +18.5%.
Costs outran prices mainly in contract business. There the company had committed to rates in advance and "worked with our customers to honor our contractual commitments while actively repricing". Profit per shipment fell on contract freight and rose on spot (one-off, market-priced) freight. Overall, truckload adjusted gross profit per transaction "declined modestly."
Truckload volume rose 0.5% in Q2 but is still down 1.5% for the half, after a weak first quarter.
Segment results
North American Surface Transportation (NAST) — the core brokerage
NAST
Q2 2026
Q2 2025
YoY
Total revenues
$3,593.3M
$2,918.2M
+23.1%
Adjusted gross profit
$469.4M
$432.2M
+8.6%
— Truckload
$261.9M
$261.5M
+0.2%
— LTL (less-than-truckload)
$183.2M
$150.5M
+21.7%
— Other
$24.3M
$20.3M
+20.2%
Income from operations
$189.8M
$164.0M
+15.8%
Average headcount
4,671
5,283
−11.6%
Volume: truckload / LTL
+0.5% / +2.0%
—
—
LTL (smaller shipments that share a trailer with other customers' freight) was the standout. The filing says some shippers moved freight from full truckloads to LTL "in response to rising truckload transportation costs." Stronger demand and favorable pricing pushed LTL profit per shipment higher, and LTL volume grew 2.0%. LTL delivered almost all of NAST's $37.1 million adjusted gross profit gain, while truckload was flat. NAST's operating income was 40.4% of its adjusted gross profit, up from 37.9% (our calculation from the segment table). Personnel expense was flat (+0.1%) despite higher incentive pay, because headcount fell 11.6%. Other SG&A rose 10.1% on higher claims expense and allocated corporate costs.
Global Forwarding — ocean, air and customs
Global Forwarding
Q2 2026
Q2 2025
YoY
Total revenues
$896.6M
$797.8M
+12.4%
Adjusted gross profit
$188.8M
$187.6M
+0.7%
— Ocean
$104.9M
$107.9M
−2.8%
— Air
$41.9M
$34.0M
+23.4%
— Customs
$31.8M
$35.1M
−9.4%
Income from operations
$61.0M
$51.3M
+18.8%
Average headcount
3,699
4,436
−16.6%
Volume: ocean / air tonnage / customs
+1.0% / −7.5% / −2.0%
—
—
Gross profit barely grew, but operating income rose 18.8% because costs were cut hard. Personnel expense fell 10.2% as average headcount dropped 16.6%. By line:
Air profit per shipment rose on "elevated global air freight pricing". Middle East airspace restrictions cut cargo capacity and jet fuel prices spiked. This more than offset 7.5% lower tonnage.
Ocean profit per shipment fell because carrier costs "increased faster than customer pricing". Shipment counts rose 1.0% on an early peak season and retailers shipping holiday inventory early.
Customs fell against a prior-year quarter that had been boosted by duty-advance fees during the 2025 tariff spike. That is a tough comparison, not necessarily a weakening business.
For the first half, forwarding adjusted gross profit is down 5.7% ($351.1M), mostly because ocean fell 12.7%: volumes dropped from early-2025 levels that had been inflated by shipping ahead of tariffs, and excess vessel capacity pushed ocean prices down early in 2026.
All Other and Corporate
Robinson Fresh (produce sourcing) adjusted gross profit rose 6.5% to $47.3M on higher foodservice volume. Managed Solutions (outsourced freight management) rose 11.9% to $32.5M on more freight under management. The segment's operating income was $4.9M, up from $0.6M.
Productivity and the AI restructuring
The margin story is mostly a headcount story. Average employees fell 10.8% company-wide while adjusted gross profit rose 6.5%. That works out to roughly $64,300 of quarterly adjusted gross profit per employee, up about 19% from $53,900 (our calculation from the filing's figures). The 10-Q does not give its own AI productivity figures. It links the cuts to its 2025 Restructuring Program, launched in Q2 2025 "through the adoption of advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence." The program includes "automation and AI-driven solutions to reduce manual processes", alongside office consolidation. Charges were $7.5M in Q2 and $27.7M in the first half. The company expects $50–75M in total from 2025 through early 2028, mostly severance. Readers should take the AI claims as management's stated rationale. The filing attributes the lower headcount to "cost optimization efforts and productivity improvements" in general and does not measure how much came from AI specifically.
Total personnel expense still rose 0.9% to $338.5M. Fewer staff was offset by higher incentive pay "reflecting our strong operating performance" and $8.0M of severance (vs. $3.9M a year ago).
Takeaway: This quarter's profit growth came from cost-cutting, not from the freight boom. Rising freight rates added $798M of revenue, but the company kept only $45M more of it as adjusted gross profit, and in truckload, its biggest line, profit per load actually fell as carrier costs outran contract prices. Operating income rose 18.4% because C.H. Robinson moved more freight with about 11% fewer people. Its earnings now depend less on the freight cycle and more on whether those productivity gains last.
Below the operating line, cash and capital
Interest and other expense fell to $17.9M from $22.0M, mainly because currency losses shrank ($1.4M vs. $4.9M); interest expense itself was roughly flat at $16.9M (+$0.1M). The Q2 tax rate was 21.5% vs. 21.4%. The first-half rate of 17.4% was held down by a 9.1-point benefit from share-based awards, a boost that may not recur.
Share count: diluted weighted shares fell about 1.1% (119.8M vs. 121.0M), which is part of why EPS (+23.8%) outgrew net income (+22.5%). The company bought back 1.27M shares in Q2 at an average price of about $167 and spent $432.2M on buybacks in the first half (vs. $128.8M), plus $154.3M in dividends.
Cash flow weakened. Operating cash flow for the half fell to $104.5M from $333.7M. Higher freight prices tie up more money in receivables (working capital), because the company pays carriers before customers pay it. Net borrowings of $595.0M helped fund buybacks and the June 22 acquisition of DeSpir Logistics (secure and high-value cargo transport, $77.8M in cash, $49.0M of goodwill). Total debt was $1,685.0M at June 30, against $154.6M of cash.
Outlook
The 10-Q gives no numeric earnings guidance. Management expects conflict-related disruptions, capacity normalization and trade policy to keep ocean and air pricing volatile in the near term. The restructuring program is expected to run into early 2028.
Our read: the second half depends on two things. First, can contract truckload rates be repriced to catch up with carrier costs? Q2's 3.5-point gap between cost growth (+29.0%) and price growth (+25.5%) is the main drag on truckload profit, and repricing would reverse it. Second, can headcount keep falling without hurting volume? NAST volume did grow 1.5% while the industry fell 3.3%, which suggests service has held up so far. Risks: underlying freight demand is still weak, so the tight market rests on reduced supply. Customs faces tough tariff-era comparisons, and the jump in borrowing and working capital leaves less financial cushion than a year ago.
Source: C.H. Robinson Worldwide Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, filed July 31, 2026. Adjusted gross profit and adjusted operating margin are company-defined non-GAAP measures reconciled in the filing. Per-employee and segment margin ratios are our calculations from reported figures.