Qualcomm revenue fell 4% to $9.95bn in fiscal Q3 2026 but operating income dropped 41% as memory-driven handset inventory cuts took $1.24bn off chipset sales and input-cost inflation squeezed gross margin, with $726m of one-off IPO gains absorbing most of the damage below the operating line.
Revenue
$9.9B
-4.0% YoY
Net income
$2.0B
-24.9% YoY
Diluted EPS
$1.87
-23.0% YoY
Operating margin
16.3%
Revenue fell 4%, operating profit fell 41% — and a stock-market windfall hid most of the damage
Qualcomm's fiscal third quarter ended June 28, 2026. (Qualcomm's financial year runs to late September, so this "fiscal Q3 2026" quarter actually covers roughly April through June 2026 — its fiscal year is about three months ahead of the calendar.)
Revenue was $9.95 billion, down 4.0% from $10.37 billion a year earlier. That modest decline is the least interesting number in the filing. Underneath it:
Operating income fell 41%, from $2.76 billion to $1.63 billion. Operating income is what's left from revenue after the cost of making the chips and all the running costs of the business, before interest and tax. As a share of revenue — the operating margin — that is 16.3%, down from 26.6%, a drop of more than ten percentage points in a single year.
Pre-tax income fell only 17%, because $1.01 billion of investment gains landed below the operating line.
Net income fell 25% to $2.00 billion, and diluted earnings per share fell 23% to $1.87 from $2.43. (Earnings per share fell slightly less than total profit because Qualcomm spent $6.8 billion buying back its own shares over the first nine months, shrinking the share count by roughly 3%.)
The gap between "revenue down 4%" and "operating profit down 41%" is the story of the quarter, and it has two separate causes: a sharp drop in the highest-volume part of the chip business, and a cost base that grew while revenue shrank.
The headline numbers
Metric
Q3 FY2026 (qtr ended 6/28/26)
Q3 FY2025 (qtr ended 6/29/25)
YoY Change
Total revenue
$9,947M
$10,365M
Read 0 community reports on Qualcomm, or write your own.Write a report
"Non-GAAP" EPS is management's own adjusted figure, which strips out stock-based pay, acquisition accounting charges and investment gains. Qualcomm's GAAP and non-GAAP numbers moved in the same direction this quarter, so the adjustment isn't hiding anything here.
Handsets: a $1.24 billion hole, caused by memory prices — not by weak phone demand
Qualcomm's chip business, QCT, sells into three markets: mobile handsets, automotive, and IoT (everything else — PCs, headsets, industrial and networking gear). Handset chips remain the single biggest line, and they fell 19.6%, or $1,242 million, to $5.09 billion.
The filing is unusually specific about why. QCT revenue fell because of "lower handsets revenues, primarily due to lower chipset shipments to certain major OEMs (primarily driven by customers adjusting build plans to reduce their inventory levels as a result of the negative effects of recent memory supply constraints and related price increases)."
That is worth unpacking, because it is not the ordinary "phone demand is soft" explanation. OEM means original equipment manufacturer — the phone makers themselves. Memory chips (DRAM and flash storage) are made by other companies entirely, and a shortage and price spike in that separate market has made each phone more expensive to build. Handset makers responded by cutting how many phones they plan to assemble and running down the parts they already hold, and Qualcomm's processors are one of those parts. So Qualcomm is losing revenue to a supply squeeze in someone else's component, not to a loss of sockets to a competitor — at least as the company reads it.
That distinction matters for how long the hit lasts. Inventory corrections are, by nature, temporary: once handset makers stop drawing down stock, orders re-normalize even if end demand is unchanged. But the filing gives no date for when that happens, and the fourth-quarter guidance (below) says it hasn't happened yet.
Automotive and IoT: the diversification is real and it is measurable
Against that, the two businesses Qualcomm has been pushing into for years both grew:
Automotive: $1,588 million, up 61.4% ($604 million more than last year) — the 23rd consecutive quarter of double-digit year-on-year growth, per the earnings release. The filing splits the increase into its two sources: $381 million came from higher revenue per unit "driven by favorable mix and higher average selling prices," and $223 million came from higher shipments "primarily from new vehicle launches with our Snapdragon digital cockpit and advanced driver assistance and automated driving (ADAS/AD) products." In plain terms: roughly a third of the growth is more chips sold, and roughly two-thirds is that each car now carries a more expensive Qualcomm chipset than it did a year ago — because carmakers are fitting richer dashboard and driver-assistance systems.
IoT: $1,830 million, up 8.9%, which the filing attributes "primarily to an increase in revenues per unit primarily driven by favorable mix" — again price and product mix rather than volume. Slower growth, and worth flagging that a mix-driven gain without unit growth is a weaker foundation than automotive's.
Together, automotive and IoT produced $3.42 billion, up 28.3%, and now account for 40.2% of QCT revenue, up from 29.6% a year ago. That shift is the clearest evidence in this filing that the strategy is working. It is also the clearest evidence that it is not yet big enough: the combined $753 million of growth in automotive and IoT offset only about 60% of the $1,242 million lost in handsets.
Licensing held up, as it usually does
QTL is Qualcomm's patent licensing business — it collects royalties from phone makers for the right to use Qualcomm's wireless patents, whether or not those phones contain a Qualcomm chip. It is a small share of revenue but an outsized share of profit, because it has almost no cost of goods: QTL earned $881 million of pre-tax profit on $1,278 million of revenue, a 68.9% margin, against 71.5% a year ago.
Revenue slipped 3.0%, and the filing breaks the $40 million decline into parts: −$67 million from lower estimated sales of cellular products by licensees, −$25 million in royalties booked for devices sold in earlier periods, partly offset by +$59 million from higher revenue per unit on favorable mix. The read-through is that licensees sold fewer devices but skewed toward pricier ones — consistent with the handset inventory correction hitting volume rather than the premium end.
One comparison trap to note: over the first nine months, group revenue includes $143 million in fiscal 2025 that came from the settlement of a licensing dispute, a one-time item the company did not allocate to any segment. Any nine-month licensing comparison that ignores it overstates the decline.
Costs rose while revenue fell — some of it by design
Three things compressed margins at once.
Gross margin fell to 53.0% from 55.6%. Gross margin is what's left of each sales dollar after the direct cost of producing the chip. The filing attributes the decline to QCT, whose own margin fell because of "higher product cost, partially offset by higher average selling prices." Management is explicit in the outlook about the cause: "The semiconductor industry is experiencing a broad-based increase in input costs, across wafer fabrication, assembly, test, advanced packaging, memory and other materials." So the same cost inflation that made phone makers cut their build plans is also making Qualcomm's own chips more expensive to produce. It is hitting the company twice.
R&D rose 17.1% to $2,607 million — from 21% of revenue to 26%. The increase splits into +$244 million in development costs for wireless and integrated-circuit technology, which the filing says was "primarily driven by lower non-recurring engineering cost reimbursements for product-related development work," plus +$101 million of share-based compensation. That first item deserves attention: non-recurring engineering reimbursements are payments customers make toward custom development work. Less customer money coming in to offset engineering costs shows up as higher R&D expense even if Qualcomm's own spending didn't change much — so part of this "increase" is a revenue-offset disappearing, not a new commitment.
SG&A rose 26.6% to $976 million, driven by +$62 million of share-based compensation, +$27 million of sales and marketing, and +$24 million from revaluing the company's deferred compensation obligation. That last one is an accounting wash and should be ignored: the filing notes it "resulted in a corresponding increase in net gains on deferred compensation plan assets within investment and other income," so the same $24 million appears as income further down. Across the whole quarter that offsetting pair is $149 million each way.
The stock-compensation increases across both lines are also partly a reclassification rather than new cost. The filing explains that the rise "includes the replacement of our annual cash incentive awards for fiscal 2026 and 2027 with a two-year equity award for our broader non-executive leadership team." Cash bonuses that would previously have appeared elsewhere are now equity grants landing in share-based compensation — the expense moved, it didn't simply appear.
Finally, $68 million of restructuring charges, "substantially all of which related to severance costs," hit the quarter — a new line with no prior-year comparison.
The part that flatters the headline: $726 million of IPO gains
Qualcomm's third reportable segment, QSI, makes venture-style investments in other companies. It generates no revenue, but this quarter it generated $768 million of pre-tax profit, against $149 million a year ago — a $619 million swing.
The driver is stated plainly: net gains on marketable securities of $726 million (versus $204 million), "primarily driven by the initial public offerings of certain QSI equity investments." Some companies Qualcomm holds stakes in went public, Qualcomm marked those stakes to their new market price, and the paper gain flowed through the income statement.
This is the single most important adjustment a reader should make. Combine the segments and the picture inverts: total pre-tax profit from Qualcomm's reportable segments was $3,841 million, actually up slightly from $3,762 million — but only because QSI's $619 million gain more than covered QCT's $479 million profit decline and QTL's $61 million. Strip out QSI, and the operating businesses earned $3,073 million versus $3,613 million, down 15%.
Investment gains of this kind are not repeatable, are unrelated to selling chips, and are the reason net income fell 25% rather than something considerably worse. Management's own guidance implicitly agrees: its fourth-quarter outlook assumes $0.00 of EPS from QSI.
Takeaway: The 4% revenue decline and even the 23% EPS decline understate what happened to the actual business. Operating profit dropped 41% because input-cost inflation hit gross margin at the same time that handset customers cut orders, and $726 million of one-off IPO gains on Qualcomm's venture portfolio — money that has nothing to do with selling chips — absorbed most of the shortfall below the operating line. Automotive and IoT growth of 28% is genuine and now covers 40% of the chip business, but at $753 million it replaced only three-fifths of the $1.24 billion lost in handsets.
Tax: the nine-month profit figure is not what it looks like
Anyone comparing Qualcomm's nine-month net income of $12.38 billion against $8.66 billion a year ago — a 43% increase — is reading an artifact. Over the same nine months, operating income fell from $9.44 billion to $7.30 billion.
The bridge is a $5.7 billion one-time income tax benefit recorded in the second fiscal quarter. The sequence: in fiscal 2025, new US tax legislation (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) led Qualcomm to conclude it would be permanently subject to the corporate alternative minimum tax, so it wrote off $5.7 billion of deferred tax assets by establishing a valuation allowance — an accounting reserve against tax benefits a company no longer expects to be able to use. Then, in the second quarter of fiscal 2026, IRS Notice 2026-07 changed that conclusion, and the company "no longer expect[s] to be subject to CAMT in the foreseeable future," so it reversed the reserve. The result is a nine-month effective tax rate of negative 50% and a full-year rate management estimates at a 40% benefit. No cash changed hands; the reversal has no bearing on operating performance.
The quarter's own tax line is more informative: the effective rate rose to 19% from 10%, because the benefit from foreign-derived deduction eligible income collapsed to $36 million from $269 million under the same legislation. That is a durable headwind to reported earnings, not a one-off.
Buying into data centers, at a loss for now
Qualcomm is spending heavily to enter the data-center market:
Alphawave IP Group, acquired December 18, 2025 for $2.3 billion (mostly 11 million Qualcomm shares plus $301 million cash), for high-speed wired connectivity technology.
Modular Inc, closed July 28, 2026 — after quarter-end, so it appears only as a subsequent event — valued at roughly $3.1 billion, paid in about 18 million shares, for AI software that runs across different hardware.
Seven other businesses for $1.1 billion combined during the first nine months.
The results so far are honest about the cost. Qualcomm's non-reportable segments (data center plus government technologies) produced $165 million of revenue, up from $54 million, but lost $214 million before tax against a $10 million loss a year ago. The data-center push is adding roughly $100 million of quarterly revenue and roughly $200 million of quarterly losses. Note also that both major acquisitions were paid in stock: roughly 29 million shares issued across the two, which works against the buyback.
Cash, and where it went
Nine-month operating cash flow was $8.41 billion, down 16% from $10.02 billion — a larger fall than net income's direction would suggest, and a better proxy for the operating deterioration than the tax-inflated profit line.
Against that, Qualcomm returned and deployed considerably more: $6.8 billion to repurchase 42 million shares (which includes offsetting the shares issued for Alphawave), $2.9 billion in dividends, $1.6 billion of capital expenditure and $1.6 billion for acquisitions. Cash and marketable securities fell to $8.30 billion from $12.48 billion at the fiscal year start, while debt rose slightly to $15.27 billion. A new $20 billion buyback authorization was approved on March 17, 2026.
This is a balance sheet being run down deliberately to fund both diversification and shareholder returns simultaneously. It is affordable at current cash generation, but it removes the cushion that made a weak quarter easy to absorb.
One more risk the filing quantifies: customer concentration is increasing, not decreasing. The largest customer moved to 23% of total revenue from 18%; the second holds 20%; a third that was 13% a year ago is now below the 10% disclosure threshold. Qualcomm is becoming more dependent on fewer buyers at the same time as it tries to broaden its end markets.
Outlook: the fourth quarter is guided lower still
For fiscal Q4 2026 (the quarter ending late September 2026), management guides:
Guidance item
Q4 FY2026 range
Total revenue
$9.7B – $10.5B
QCT revenue
$8.4B – $9.0B
QTL revenue
$1.2B – $1.4B
GAAP diluted EPS
$1.22 – $1.42
Non-GAAP diluted EPS
$2.05 – $2.25
Qualcomm reported $11.27 billion of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 (derived from full-year FY2025 revenue of $44.28 billion less the $33.01 billion reported in the first nine months). So the guidance midpoint of $10.1 billion implies a year-on-year decline of about 10% — and even the top of the range is down roughly 7%. The rate of decline is set to get worse, not better, next quarter. That is the most important forward-looking fact in the filing, and it says the handset inventory correction was still running as the quarter closed.
On margins, management says it is "taking concrete actions to reflect the higher input costs in our product pricing and expect these actions to benefit our gross margins over time as the pricing changes gradually come into effect." The word doing the work is "gradually." Cost increases land immediately; renegotiated chip prices land at the next design win or contract renewal. Expect the squeeze to persist for at least another quarter or two.
Longer term, CEO Cristiano Amon set out targets from a recent investor day: non-handset revenue reaching $40 billion by fiscal 2029, with year-on-year growth in non-handset revenue "accelerat[ing] from 24% in fiscal 2026 to greater than 60% in fiscal 2027." The fiscal 2027 figure is a large step up from what this quarter shows — automotive and IoT together grew 28% — and it leans on the data-center business, which today produces about $165 million a quarter at a loss. These are company targets, not results; they should be treated as a statement of intent and re-checked against actual quarterly data-center revenue.
Our read on trajectory. Two of the three pressures on this quarter should fade. The handset inventory correction is by definition finite, and input-cost inflation can be recovered through pricing given Qualcomm's position in premium Android sockets — though both on management's own timetable of "gradually," not this quarter. The third pressure is the one that won't fade: operating expenses are up $586 million year-on-year and management states plainly that it "expect[s] to continue investing in key growth and diversification initiatives." That spending is deliberate and, on the automotive evidence, productive, but it means the margin structure has reset lower for as long as the buildout runs. The bull case rests on automotive and IoT compounding at 28% until they are large enough that handset cycles stop setting the group's direction; on this quarter's arithmetic that is still several years away. The near-term risk is straightforward: guidance already points to a worse year-on-year quarter than the one just reported, and the $726 million of IPO gains that cushioned this quarter will not repeat.