Reported revenue fell 1.4% only because Starbucks deconsolidated its China stores mid-quarter; underlying global comparable sales rose 7.9% led by transactions, while GAAP EPS of $0.91 was inflated by a $0.47 divestiture gain and depressed by a $302.6M restructuring charge.
Revenue
$9.3B
-1.4% YoY
Net income
$1.0B
+87.2% YoY
Diluted EPS
$0.91
+85.7% YoY
Operating margin
10.5%
A 1% revenue decline that hides the strongest demand quarter of the turnaround
Starbucks' reported revenue for its fiscal third quarter (the 13 weeks ended June 28, 2026) fell 1.4% to $9,322.7 million from $9,456.0 million a year earlier. Almost none of that is a demand problem. During the quarter, Starbucks closed the sale of a 60% stake in its China retail business to funds managed by Boyu Capital, keeping 40% and continuing to own and license the brand and intellectual property to the new joint venture. That deconsolidation — 7,991 company-operated stores converted to licensed stores mid-quarter — removed $776 million of company-operated store revenue from the quarter. Strip it out and the underlying business grew: global comparable store sales (sales at stores open 13 months or longer, excluding currency effects) rose 7.9%, adding $524 million.
More important than the size of that comp number is its composition. Of the 7.9%, 4.2 points came from more transactions and 3.5 points from a higher average ticket (what a customer spends per visit). For a turnaround that began with customers walking away, transaction growth outrunning ticket growth is the signal that matters: Starbucks is selling more visits, not just charging more for the same ones. A year ago, international transactions were up 1.0% while ticket fell 1.4%; this quarter both moved up.
Nine-month figures put the quarter in context: revenue for the first three quarters of fiscal 2026 was $28,769.3 million, up 4.2%, but operating margin was 9.4% versus 9.6% a year ago and net earnings were $1,849.6 million versus $1,723.2 million — up only 7.3% despite a half-billion-dollar one-time gain in the quarter. The year-to-date numbers are still absorbing the cost of the turnaround; the June quarter is the first one where the benefits clearly outweighed them.
What the China deal actually did to the financials
The transaction is the single largest distortion in this quarter's statements, and it runs through nearly every line:
Revenue down, margin up. Management states plainly that it expects the licensed model to "continue to drive lower revenues and higher operating margin for Starbucks, as compared to the historical, company-operated model." Under a license, Starbucks books a royalty and product sales instead of every cup sold — far less revenue, far less cost. International segment revenue fell 34% to $1,322.6 million, while its operating margin expanded 550 basis points to 19.1% — roughly 800 basis points of which the filing attributes directly to the conversion. That 19.1% is not an operating improvement; it is a different business mix.
A $536.3 million book gain, recorded below operating income, equal to $0.47 per share.
$2,544.2 million of net cash proceeds, of which approximately $1.3 billion went to tender offers for five series of senior notes in May 2026. Long-term debt fell from $14,575.9 million at fiscal year-end to $11,780.2 million.
A tax bill that largely consumed the gain. Classifying China as held for sale in Q1 forced Starbucks to release its indefinite-reinvestment assertions on foreign earnings, a $266 million discrete charge (increased by $8 million in Q2), and the divestiture itself added $147.8 million of incremental tax expense in Q3. Year-to-date the effective tax rate is 36.5% versus 26.5% a year ago. The gain looks large in the quarter; across the fiscal year it is close to a wash after tax and restructuring.
The store base is now mostly other people's capital. Of 41,304 stores, 67% are licensed and 33% company-operated. International company-operated stores fell from 10,277 to 2,464 in a year.
North America: the recovery is real, and it is being spent
North America — the U.S. and Canada, about 79% of revenue — grew revenue 6.8% to $7,395.1 million on comparable store sales of +8.1% (transactions +4.5%, ticket +3.5%). The filing credits "higher delivery sales and strength in customer food attach and beverage modifications" — that is, more delivery orders, more customers adding a food item, and more paid customizations to drinks. U.S. comps specifically were +7.9%.
Yet North America operating income rose only 9.8% to $1,008.9 million and margin gained just 30 basis points, to 13.6%. The segment's own margin bridge explains why almost all of an 8.1% comp was given back:
Driver
Effect on North America operating margin
Sales leverage
+340 bps
Lapping the 2025 Leadership Experience event
+120 bps
Lower inflation plus tariff refunds
+110 bps
Higher restructuring costs
-240 bps
Labor investments for "Back to Starbucks"
-190 bps
Product mix shift
-100 bps
Sales leverage — the margin benefit of spreading fixed costs like rent over more sales — was the largest single positive, and it was nearly cancelled by labor and restructuring. Across the first three quarters, North America's margin is actually down 210 basis points to 11.8%, which the filing attributes primarily to labor investments (about 240 basis points). Store operating expenses as a share of company-operated store revenue still rose, to 55.9% from 55.6% company-wide, with labor adding roughly 190 basis points and higher reserves for self-insured claims another 100.
North America also stopped growing its footprint: the segment ended the quarter with 18,371 stores, a net decline of 14 in the quarter (27 company-operated opened, 41 licensed closed), and 247 stores have been closed year-to-date under the fiscal 2025 restructuring plan.
The one-offs that flatter — and one that hurts
This is a quarter where GAAP and adjusted figures diverge in both directions, and netting them out matters:
Per-share item
Q3 FY2026
Diluted EPS (GAAP)
$0.91
Restructuring and impairments
+$0.26
China transaction costs
+$0.04
Transformation costs
+$0.02
Net gain on divestiture
-$0.47
Tax effect of the above
+$0.09
Diluted EPS (non-GAAP)
$0.85
The $0.47 gain is not repeatable. Neither is the $302.6 million restructuring and impairment charge (versus $20.8 million a year ago), of which $217.4 million was disposal and impairment of store and non-retail facility assets — largely a write-down of the Starbucks Reserve and Roastery locations, plus $72.6 million of severance. That impairment is a strategic admission worth noting: the newly announced fiscal 2026 plan is aimed at "reducing the future operational complexity" of the Reserve and Roastery format, the high-end flagship concept the previous strategy leaned on.
One genuinely one-off benefit deserves flagging because it is buried in cost of goods. On April 20, 2026 U.S. Customs opened a process for refunds of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act; Starbucks filed and "received substantially all of the refunds requested," which "largely offset related tariffs incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2026" — a three-quarter recovery landing in one quarter's product and distribution costs. It contributed roughly 80 basis points (with lower inflation) to consolidated product cost improvement, and it is the dominant reason Channel Development's operating margin jumped 700 basis points to 52.1%: the filing attributes about 1,370 basis points of that to tariff impacts including refunds, partly offset by 470 basis points of mix and 260 basis points of weaker North American Coffee Partnership income. Channel Development's 52.1% margin this quarter should not be extrapolated.
Set against these, the underlying improvement is still substantial: non-GAAP operating margin of 14.4% versus 10.1% is a 430 basis point gain, far larger than the 60 basis points GAAP shows, because GAAP carries the restructuring charge while the offsetting divestiture gain sits below the operating line.
Cash, debt and the dividend
Year-to-date operating cash flow was $3,604.1 million, up from $3,365.7 million. Capital spending nearly halved, to $887.8 million from $1,849.5 million — partly because China's stores stopped consuming Starbucks' capital once classified as held for sale, and partly deliberate discipline. Dividends paid were $2,118.0 million; the board raised the quarterly dividend to $0.62 per share from $0.61. There were no share repurchases in the period: the proceeds from China went to debt ($2,815.9 million of long-term repayments year-to-date), not buybacks. Cash and investments stood at $3.9 billion, with $3.0 billion of untapped revolver capacity and no commercial paper outstanding.
Takeaway: The reported numbers are the wrong place to judge this quarter. Revenue fell only because Starbucks sold control of its China stores, and GAAP EPS nearly doubled only because that sale produced a $0.47-per-share gain. What actually changed is that U.S. customers came back in greater numbers — transactions up 4.5% in North America, ahead of ticket — and that for the first time in this turnaround the sales leverage from those visits (+340 bps in North America) roughly covered the labor and restructuring being spent to generate them. The recovery is now paying for itself at the margin, not yet funding much beyond that.
Guidance and our read
Management raised fiscal 2026 guidance alongside the filing:
Fourth-quarter U.S. comparable store sales growth of 6.5% or greater, producing full-year U.S. comps slightly above 6.0% and global comps nearing 6.0%
Consolidated net revenues flat to slightly higher year over year
Non-GAAP EPS of $2.55 to $2.65, reconciling from projected GAAP EPS of $2.14 to $2.24
Approximately 600 to 650 net new stores globally
Guidance assumes China is a licensed joint venture for the full second half, so the revenue line is not comparable to prior years by design.
Our read: the Q4 guide is a deceleration from the 7.9% U.S. comp just delivered, which is consistent with the June quarter having been helped by a soft prior-year base and by marketing and delivery pushes whose incremental effect narrows. The more interesting question is margin. Reaching "greater than 11.0%" non-GAAP for the full year after nine months at 9.4% GAAP requires Q4 to carry both continued sales leverage and the cost savings from the support-organization and Reserve/Roastery simplification — and management itself expects tariff and coffee-price pressure to keep easing into Q4, which would help. The risk is the reverse of this quarter's pattern: the tariff refund was a catch-up payment that will not repeat, so Q4 product costs face a harder comparison even if inflation cooperates.
Two things to watch next quarter. First, whether transactions keep leading ticket in North America — if the mix flips back toward ticket, the comp is being carried by price and customization rather than returning customers, which is a weaker foundation. Second, the first clean quarter of the China joint venture as an equity-method investment: income from equity investees rose $22 million this quarter on a partial period, and how that line scales will determine whether Starbucks kept enough economics in a market it once ran itself.
Source: Starbucks Corporation Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2026, filed July 29, 2026 (accession 0000829224-26-000130), and the related earnings release furnished on Form 8-K the same day.