Ascent's sales jumped 37.6% to $25.7M on higher prices, more volume and the Midwest acquisition, and the operating loss shrank to $0.3M, but the $0.67M profit came almost entirely from a tax benefit and cash fell by half in six months.
Revenue
$26M
+37.6% YoY
Net income
$670K
-89.3% YoY
Diluted EPS
$0.07
-89.2% YoY
Operating margin
-1.0%
This period vs a year ago
Same period last year
This period
Revenue▲+37.6%
≈$19M
$26M
Net income▼-89.3%
≈$6.3M
$670K
Diluted EPS▼-89.2%
≈$0.65
$0.07
Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.
Sales up 37.6%, operating loss nearly gone, but the profit is a tax line
Ascent Industries (formerly Synalloy) is now purely a specialty chemicals maker. It sold its last two stainless steel pipe and tube businesses, Bristol Metals and American Stainless Tubing, in the first half of 2025. It makes ingredients and processing aids for household and industrial cleaners, coatings and adhesives, oil and gas, farming, water treatment and other markets. In the second quarter of 2026 (April to June), net sales rose 37.6% to $25.7 million from $18.7 million. Shipments by weight rose 15.2% and average selling prices rose 23.0%. A small acquisition added $1.9 million: Midwest Graphic Sales, a maker of coatings and inks for packaging, bought on May 4 for about $13.5 million in cash. Leaving that out, sales grew about 27% on their own.
The operating loss (the loss from running the business, before interest and tax) shrank to $0.3 million from $2.7 million. Most of that came from lower overhead. Ascent reported net income of $0.67 million, or $0.07 per share, but pre-tax income was only $69,000. The rest came from a $0.6 million tax benefit.
At a glance
Sales +37.6% to $25.7M: prices up 23%, pounds shipped up 15%, plus about $1.9M from Midwest.
Adjusted EBITDA of $1.45M (5.7% of sales) vs a $0.34M loss a year ago: this is the company's own measure of cash-like operating profit (before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and one-off items). It turned positive, but it is still thin.
Cash down to $28.1M from $57.6M at the end of 2025: the Midwest purchase ($13.5M), share buybacks ($6.85M) and $7.7M of cash used by operations all came out of cash. There is still no bank debt.
The numbers
Metric
Q2 2026
Q2 2025
YoY Change
Net sales
Read 0 community reports on Ascent Industries Co., or write your own.Write a report
The headline net income and EPS fell almost 90%. That is only because Q2 2025 included an $8.7 million gain from the businesses Ascent sold ("discontinued operations"). The fair comparison is the business Ascent still owns: it went from a $2.45 million loss to a $0.67 million profit.
For the first half of 2026, sales rose 23.6% to $45.1 million and the net loss was $1.3 million. A year earlier, the continuing business lost $4.5 million. The first quarter was weak: by subtracting Q1 from the half-year figures, Q1 had $19.4 million of sales and a $2.0 million loss. So most of the half-year improvement came in Q2.
Where the growth came from
Ascent splits its sales three ways. Custom Manufacturing is chemicals made to a customer's own recipe, sometimes called tolling. Core Technology is products made from Ascent's own formulas. Distribution is reselling products without processing them. The change is lopsided:
Core Technology more than doubled, from $4.4 million to $9.3 million. This is the part management wants to grow, because Ascent owns the formula and can set prices, instead of just charging a processing fee.
Custom Manufacturing rose only 5.2%, to $15.0 million.
Distribution, a new line, contributed $1.3 million. It had no sales a year ago.
The filing does not say how much of the Core Technology jump came from Midwest, and it only gives Midwest's total contribution of $1.9 million. Even if all of that sat in Core Technology, the older Core Technology business would still have grown by roughly two-thirds. Management calls Q2 "an important inflection point" and says the legacy business grew organically "well above both the market and many of our peers."
What the headline numbers hide
The profit is a tax benefit, not an operating profit. Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $69,000. The $601,000 tax benefit turned that into $670,000 of net income. Management says the benefit came from "changes in forecasted income (loss) and the resulting changes in the valuation allowance on federal and state deferred tax assets", an accounting adjustment to the value of past losses Ascent can use to cut future tax bills. That produced a quarterly tax rate of (869.2)%, which will not repeat. Before tax, the quarter was roughly break-even.
Gross margin fell even though prices rose 23%. Gross margin is the share of sales left after the direct cost of making the product. It dropped from 26.1% to 21.6%. The segment note shows why: raw materials took 52.4% of sales ($13.4M), up from 47.3% ($8.8M). Most of the price increases passed higher input costs through to customers rather than widening Ascent's markup. Gross profit in dollars still rose 14.0%, to $5.5 million.
Lower overhead explains the smaller loss. Overhead (SG&A) fell $0.9 million, on lower incentive bonuses, professional fees and repairs, partly offset by higher salaries. The cash flow statement also shows a $0.96 million non-cash benefit in the first half from lower expected losses on unpaid customer bills: the allowance for bad debts fell from $1.0 million to $0.1 million. A one-time drop in reserves like that cannot be repeated every quarter.
Last year's comparison has one-offs too. Q2 2025's operating loss included a $1.6 million asset impairment (a write-down) and a $0.5 million gain from changing a lease. Without both, the year-ago operating loss would have been about $1.6 million, still much worse than this quarter's $0.3 million.
Cash conversion is poor. For the first half, operations used $7.7 million of cash while the net loss was only $1.3 million. Money owed by customers (receivables) rose from $10.0 million at year-end to $18.6 million, including $1.2 million acquired with Midwest. That growth is far faster than sales. Management says customers are taking longer to pay ("increased days sales outstanding"). Inventory also rose $1.1 million.
The segment figures are skewed by an accounting change. The chemicals segment's own net income fell to $0.66 million from $1.50 million, and its adjusted EBITDA margin fell from 13.6% to 7.3%. The main reason is that Ascent now charges more head-office costs to the segment ("corporate expense allocation"). Unallocated corporate costs fell 76.5%, to $0.7 million. The consolidated figures are the ones to trust.
Buybacks helped per-share figures a little. Diluted shares fell 6.5%, to 9.11 million. Ascent bought back 209,868 shares in Q2 at an average of $13.80, and 505,563 in the first half for $6.85 million. With per-share profit at $0.07, that barely matters for now.
Balance sheet and cash
Ascent had $28.1 million of cash at June 30 and no borrowings on its $30 million bank credit line, with $17.9 million of that line available. Its only debt is a $1.0 million note that finances an insurance premium. Interest income was $0.2 million in the quarter. That will shrink as cash is spent. In the first half, $13.5 million went to Midwest, $6.85 million to buybacks, $1.2 million to equipment, and $7.7 million to fund operations. At that pace the cash buffer is still large, but it is no longer the $57.6 million Ascent held after the steel pipe sales. Management expects up to $3.0 million more of capital spending in the rest of 2026.
Takeaway: For the first time since becoming a pure chemicals company, Ascent is close to break-even before tax, on sales up 37.6%. But the reported profit is a tax benefit, gross margin fell, and customers are paying more slowly, so the business is not yet earning its keep. Watch whether gross margin and cash from operations improve in the second half.
Outlook
Ascent gives no sales or earnings guidance. The only forward numbers in the filing are up to $3.0 million of capital spending for the rest of 2026 and a note that recently imposed tariffs could hurt sales and profitability. Management adds that much of its raw material is bought in the US. Midwest had no net income from May 4 to June 30, after $0.3 million of amortization on acquired intangible assets (the customer relationships and brand names it bought). Management nonetheless says the deal was "delivering earnings accretion from day one" (it does not say on which measure). Pro forma figures, as if Ascent had owned Midwest all year, put Q2 2026 sales at $26.6 million against $21.4 million a year earlier.
Our read: the sales trend is real and broad (both volume and price are up, and the higher-value Core Technology line doubled). But getting from break-even to real profit depends on gross margin recovering toward the mid-20s and on overhead staying near $5.5 million a quarter. Neither is guaranteed while material costs outpace prices. The Q3 10-Q, expected in early November (last year's arrived on November 4), will show whether Q2's improvement over a weak Q1 continues, and whether receivables start turning back into cash.
This is the first report we have published on Ascent Industries, so there is no earlier outlook to check against.