BLNE — Q2 2026 Financial Report Analysis
Q2 · Fiscal year 2026 · Published by Pham Hop
Beeline's Q2 2026 revenue rose 57% to $2.6M on 28% more loans, but the $4.0M net loss barely moved, cash fell to $1.4M and the 10-Q says it needs at least $6M more to fund the next 12 months.
- Revenue
- $2.6M
- +56.6% YoY
- Net income
- -$4.0M
- -2.6% YoY
- Diluted EPS
- $-0.13
- -79.7% YoY
- Operating margin
- -171.0%
This period vs a year ago
- Same period last year
- This period
Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.
Revenue up 57% on more loans, but cash is down to $1.4 million and the 10-Q says the company needs at least $6 million more
Beeline Holdings is a small online mortgage lender (about 77% of its loans are "Non-QM" — mortgages for borrowers such as the self-employed whose income doesn't fit standard bank paperwork) that also runs a title-insurance business and a fractional home-equity product with a related company, TYTL. In the second quarter of 2026 (April–June), total net revenue rose 57% from a year earlier to $2.6 million as the company closed 240 loans versus 187. The net loss was $4.0 million, roughly the same as a year ago's $4.1 million. The most important line in the filing is not in the income statement: management writes that "we do not have sufficient cash resources to meet our working capital needs for the next 12 months" and that it needs "at least $6 million," with $1.4 million of cash at June 30 (about $1.7 million as of August 14).
At a glance
- Revenue $2.63 million, +57% year on year — but down about 3% from Q1 2026's $2.70 million (derived from the six-month figures), as loan count fell from 288 in Q1 to 240.
- Loss per share $0.13 vs $0.64 — the 80% improvement is almost entirely a bigger share count (31.4 million weighted average shares vs 9.8 million) and the absence of a $2.2 million year-ago "deemed dividend"; the dollar net loss barely moved.
- Cash $1.4 million vs a stated need of at least $6 million — the filing's "substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern" language remains, and funding depends on selling new shares.
Key figures
| Metric | Q2 2026 | Q2 2025 | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total net revenue | $2.63M | $1.68M | +56.6% |
| Gain on sale of loans, net | $1.75M | $1.11M | +57.6% |
| Loan originations (number of loans) | 240 | 187 | +28.3% |
| Total operating expenses | $7.12M | $5.57M | +27.7% |
| Loss from operations | -$4.49M | -$3.90M | Loss widened 15.2% |
| Operating margin | -171.0% | -232.5% | +61.4 pts |
| Net loss | -$4.03M | -$4.14M | -2.6% (loss narrowed $0.1M) |
| Net loss per share (basic and diluted) | -$0.13 | -$0.64 | -79.7% (loss per share narrowed) |
| Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) | -$2.61M | -$2.76M | Loss narrowed 5.5% |
| Weighted average shares | 31.4M | 9.8M | +220% |
Operating margin is loss from operations divided by revenue — here, how many cents the company lost running the business for every dollar it brought in. A -171% margin means it spent about $2.71 for every $1.00 of revenue.
What drove revenue
A mortgage lender like Beeline mostly earns money by making a loan and selling it to an investor soon after; the profit on that sale is booked as gain on sale of loans. That line rose 64% (per the 10-Q's rounded figures; $1.75 million vs $1.11 million), which the filing attributes to "increased loan originations and loan pricing." The pricing part shows in the per-loan math: gain on sale per loan was about $7,300 this quarter versus about $5,950 a year ago. Loan origination fees doubled to $0.38 million, and title fees were "flat" at $0.41 million versus $0.37 million.
The new businesses are still tiny. Fractional equity revenue from TYTL — the related-party product where homeowners sell a slice of their home's equity — was $21,000. "Other revenues" of $64,000 include $50,000 of related-party fees.
Where the money went
Operating expenses rose $1.5 million (28%) to $7.1 million, and each increase has a specific cause in the MD&A:
- Compensation, commissions and benefits: +$0.9 million (+43%) to $3.0 million. Of that, $0.8 million was higher stock-based pay under the 2025 Equity Incentive Plan adopted in October 2025 — non-cash, but a real cost to shareholders through dilution.
- Marketing and advertising: +$0.3 million (+38%) to $1.1 million, "due to increased leads." Marketing grew faster than loan count (+28%), so the cost per funded loan rose from about $4,200 to about $4,700.
- Other operating expenses: doubled to $1.0 million, from "increased fees charged by investors of our loans" and higher software fees.
- General and administrative: down 14% to $1.2 million, on lower professional fees.
Revenue grew faster than expenses, which is why the operating margin improved by 61.4 points. But in dollars the operating loss still widened from $3.9 million to $4.5 million.
What the headline numbers hide
- A one-off gain shrank the loss. On June 30 Beeline bought the 52.4% of MagicBlocks (the AI company behind its "Bob" chatbot) it didn't already own. Accounting rules required it to revalue its existing 47.6% stake, producing a $0.48 million paper gain. Without it, the Q2 net loss would have been about $4.5 million — wider than a year ago, not narrower.
- The year-ago loss was inflated by financing costs that are gone. Q2 2025 carried $0.39 million of interest on corporate debt that has since been repaid or converted. Beeline now reports "no corporate debt", so part of the flat net loss reflects a cleaner balance sheet, not better operations.
- Loss per share improved because of dilution, not profit. Weighted shares more than tripled, and Q2 2025 also included a $2.2 million "deemed dividend" (an accounting charge tied to price-protection terms on Series G preferred stock and warrants) that hit common shareholders' per-share result. Both flatter the 80% per-share improvement.
- Adjusted EBITDA leaves out a fast-growing cost. The company's -$2.6 million adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; "adjusted" here also removes stock pay and one-offs) adds back $1.06 million of stock-based compensation, up from $23,000 a year ago. The adjusted loss narrowed only $0.15 million year on year.
- Operating cash flow looks better than it is. Six-month operating cash outflow was only $1.5 million against a $9.3 million net loss, but that includes a $7.8 million net inflow from selling down mortgages held for sale (proceeds of $133.1 million vs $125.3 million of new originations). That cash went straight to repaying warehouse lines — the short-term credit lines lenders use to fund loans before selling them — by $4.1 million. Excluding the loan-inventory swing, operations used roughly $9.3 million in six months, funded mostly by $4.1 million of share sales and the opening cash balance.
- Q2 was weaker than Q1 on volume. Comparing against the derived Q1 2026 figures, loans fell from 288 to 240 and revenue slipped from $2.70 million to $2.63 million. The net loss did narrow from $5.3 million in Q1, helped by the $0.48 million remeasurement gain and lower G&A.
- The balance sheet is mostly goodwill. Of $62.9 million in total assets, $33.3 million is goodwill and $4.8 million intangibles (accounting values left over from acquisitions, not cash). Shareholders' equity of $50.5 million drops to about $12.4 million once those are excluded.
Takeaway: Beeline is growing loan volume and earning more per loan, but at -171% operating margins the business consumed roughly $9 million of operating cash in the first half against $1.4 million in the bank — so the share count, not the loan book, is the number most likely to keep rising fast.
Funding, related parties and the TYTL deal
The filing lists how Beeline is bridging the gap. It sold $3.2 million of stock under an equity line (ELOC — an arrangement letting it sell shares to an investor over time) and $0.8 million through an at-the-market offering in the first half. On July 31 it borrowed $0.4 million on a 60-day note at 9% interest, issued at a $50,000 discount. On August 12, CEO Nick Liuzza put in $0.5 million through a note that converts to stock at the higher of $1.50 per share or the five-day average price.
On July 28 Beeline signed a non-binding letter of intent to merge with TYTL in an all-stock deal. TYTL is a blockchain-based real-estate tokenization platform and already Beeline's partner on the fractional equity product. It is a related party: Liuzza is CEO of both companies, and the CFO and one director are TYTL stockholders. The 10-Q says the deal still needs due diligence, definitive agreements, a special committee's approval, a fairness opinion and votes by both sets of shareholders. Separately, Beeline is one of 28 defendants in a class action (Mendez et al. v. Optimal Blue) filed in October 2025; the related legal costs are among the "non-recurring expenses" excluded from adjusted EBITDA.
Outlook
Management gave no numerical guidance. The earnings release says July revenue "is expected to be the highest of the year," July operating margin "the highest since inception," and that the company is "progressing toward operating break-even." It also says the TYTL product would generate "approximately 3x more revenue per transaction" with economics "not directly tied to interest rates." These are management's claims, and none of them is backed by figures in the 10-Q.
Our read: the core lending business is improving at the unit level. Gain on sale per loan is up about 23% and loan count is up 28% year on year. But the gap to break-even is large. Q2 operating expenses were $7.1 million against $2.6 million of revenue, and even excluding $0.8 million of depreciation and $1.06 million of stock pay, cash costs of roughly $5.2 million are about double revenue. Mortgage rates rose back to about 6.4–6.5% by the end of June, per the 10-Q, which works against volume. In the Q3 report (10-Q due around mid-November), watch three things: whether the July strength shows up as a sequential revenue increase over Q2's $2.6 million; cash and the share count at September 30, against the "at least $6 million" need; and whether the TYTL letter of intent becomes a definitive agreement, and on what terms, given it is a deal between companies with the same CEO.