Financial Report Insights

HON — Q3 2026 Financial Report Analysis

Q3 · Fiscal year 2026 · Published by Pham Hop

Honeywell's first standalone quarter after the Aerospace spin: sales +1% (+7% organic), segment margin up 370 bps to 21.3% and adjusted EPS +34% to $2.27, with guidance raised, though GAAP EPS fell 20% to $2.40 on a prior-year one-off gain and most of the margin gain came from lower corporate overhead.

At a glance

  • 7% organic sales growth, with every segment growing, above the 4%–6% the company had guided for the second half. Volume added 2 points and price 5 points, so customers bought more as well as paying more, unlike Q2, when all the growth came from price.
  • Segment margin of 21.3%, up 370 basis points (3.7 percentage points). About $140 million of the $196 million profit gain came from lower corporate overhead after the spin-offs, not from the three businesses themselves.
  • Full-year adjusted EPS guidance raised to $8.40–$8.45 from $8.05–$8.35, and free cash flow guidance to about $2.1 billion from about $2.0 billion.
Revenue
$5.0B
+1.3% YoY
Net income
$767M
-19.8% YoY
Diluted EPS
$2.40
-19.7% YoY
Operating margin
14.8%

This period vs a year ago

  • Same period last year
  • This period
Revenue+1.3%
≈$4.9B
$5.0B
Net income-19.8%
≈$956M
$767M
Diluted EPS-19.7%
≈$2.99
$2.40

Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.

How HON compares with Industrials peers

  • HON
  • Peer median
  • Each peer (hover for name)
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.3% · median +8.4% · 72nd of 81
≤ -0.7%≥ +32.1%
Operating margin14.8% · median 17.9% · 48th of 80
≤ 5.2%≥ 38.1%
EPS growth (YoY)-19.7% · median +13.4% · 74th of 79
≤ -27.7%≥ +92.3%

Rank 1 = fastest revenue growth, highest operating margin, fastest EPS growth. Peers are the other Industrials companies with a 2026 report on this site, each at its latest period we've analyzed; fiscal calendars differ, so periods are not always the same months.

First quarter as a standalone automation company

Honeywell's Q3 2026 is the first quarter reported without Aerospace, which was spun off on June 29 and now sits in "discontinued operations" for every period shown. What remains, renamed Honeywell Technologies, sells building, process and industrial automation equipment and services. Reported sales rose just 1% to $4,994 million, but that figure is held down by two businesses sold during the quarter. Strip those out, along with acquisitions and currency, and sales grew 7% "organically" (comparing the same set of businesses in both years). Reported diluted EPS fell 20% to $2.40 only because the year-ago quarter included an $802 million one-time gain. Adjusted EPS, the company's figure with one-offs removed, rose 34% to $2.27, and management raised its full-year outlook for a second quarter in a row.

Headline numbers

MetricQ3 2026Q3 2025YoY Change
Net sales$4,994M$4,929M+1.3%
Organic sales growth+7%——
Gross margin40.4%36.0%+440 bps
Operating income$740M$413M+79%
Operating margin14.8%8.4%+640 bps
Segment profit$1,062M$866M+23%
Segment margin21.3%17.6%+370 bps
Net income, continuing ops (attributable)$767M$956M−19.8%
Diluted EPS, continuing ops$2.40$2.99−19.7%
Adjusted diluted EPS$2.27$1.70+34%
Operating cash flow, continuing ops$607M$2,306M−74%
Free cash flow (company definition)$688M$599M+15%
Backlog (period-end)$18.8B—+1% reported, +7% excl. divestitures

Operating margin is operating income as a share of sales: what is left after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. Segment margin is Honeywell's own, wider measure. It also leaves out stock compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, restructuring charges and similar items, and management guides on it. Both the 2025 and 2026 figures exclude Aerospace and Solstice Advanced Materials, and all per-share figures reflect the one-for-two reverse stock split of June 29, 2026. Income statement, segment and backlog figures are from the 10-Q; organic growth, operating income, adjusted EPS and free cash flow are from the same-day earnings release (8-K Exhibit 99).

Where the sales growth came from

The 10-Q's sales bridge for the quarter: volume +2%, price +5%, acquisitions +3%, divestitures −9%, currency 0%. The −9% is the Warehouse and Workflow Solutions (WWS) and Productivity Solutions and Services (PSS) businesses, sold on July 27 and August 3. The +3% is mostly Johnson Matthey's Catalyst Technologies business, bought on July 17 for $1,743 million net of cash. The change from Q2 is the volume line. Q2's bridge showed volume at 0%, with all growth coming from price. This quarter, physical sales rose too.

SegmentQ3 2026 salesQ3 2025 salesReportedOrganicSegment margin 20262025
Building Automation$2,020M$1,878M+8%+8%27.0%26.7%
Process Automation and Technology$1,859M$1,598M+16%+8%22.2%24.3%
Industrial Automation$1,115M$1,450M−23%+4%18.4%14.9%

Building Automation remains the cleanest business. Sales rose $142 million: $110 million more in products and $38 million more in solutions, "both driven by higher demand," according to the 10-Q. The release says building products grew 11%, led by fire and security, and building solutions grew 4% on services. Margin rose 30 basis points to 27.0% on volume and on price increases that covered inflation.

Process Automation and Technology (refining technology, catalysts and process control) grew 8% organically, after falling 1% organically in Q2. Project sales grew 14% on LNG and petrochemical work ($98 million of organic growth), and aftermarket sales (catalysts, spare parts and services sold after the original project) rose $26 million on refining demand. Johnson Matthey added $131 million of sales. Margin still fell 210 basis points to 22.2%. The company blames project mix (large projects earn less than aftermarket sales) and dilution from the Johnson Matthey business, which joins at a lower margin. The segment's profit rose only $23 million on $261 million of extra sales.

Industrial Automation reported a 23% fall in sales, all of it from the WWS/PSS sale ($375 million of lost sales). The remaining businesses grew 4% organically, led by 16% growth in solutions, mainly industrial measurement and utilities. Products were flat: double-digit growth in sensing was offset by what the release calls "industry-wide meter deployment deferrals in utilities." Margin jumped 350 basis points to 18.4%. Part of that is price and productivity, and part is that the divested, lower-margin businesses left: segment profit fell only $11 million while sales fell $335 million.

What the headline numbers hide

  • Most of the margin gain came from corporate overhead, not the businesses. Total segment profit rose $196 million. The three segments together rose only $56 million (from $1,107 million to $1,163 million, +5%). The rest came from "Corporate and All Other," whose cost fell to $101 million from $241 million. The 10-Q explains why the prior-year figure was so high: corporate costs once charged to Aerospace and Advanced Materials, which could not be moved into discontinued operations, stayed in this line. The release credits the improvement to "elimination of stranded costs related to prior spin-offs and divestitures." That saving is real and should continue, but it happens once. It will not repeat as growth after the next four quarters. The combined margin of the three segments was 23.3%, against 22.5% a year earlier, a more modest improvement than the 370-basis-point headline.
  • GAAP EPS fell because of last year's one-off, and this year's has its own. The 10-Q breaks down the $0.59 fall in diluted EPS: the 2025 Resideo termination gain (−$2.51), partly offset by this quarter's $339 million pre-tax gain on selling WWS/PSS (+$0.70), "higher tax benefits driven by U.S. federal, and state matters" (+$0.58) and higher segment profit (+$0.52). The effective tax rate fell 660 basis points. The 10-Q attributes 3,950 basis points to changes in tax-matter accruals, partly offset by 3,290 basis points of transaction-related and other tax costs. Adjusted EPS removes the WWS/PSS gain and adds back a $0.35 loss from Honeywell's 48% stake in Quantinuum. The adjusted-EPS reconciliation has no separate line for tax items, and its divestiture-cost line carries a $182 million tax benefit. So from the filings alone it is not clear how much of the low tax rate is still inside the $2.27.
  • Lower interest helped, buybacks did not. Interest and other financial charges fell to $143 million from $263 million after $7.5 billion of debt tender offers and redemptions; total borrowings are $16.6 billion against $34.6 billion at year-end. Interest income also fell, to $50 million from $85 million, while cash and short-term investments dropped to $6.2 billion from $12.7 billion at year-end. The release lists lower net interest as one driver of the 34% adjusted EPS rise. The diluted share count was flat at 319.2 million against 319.4 million, so buybacks added nothing this quarter.
  • Cash flow is decent, with an adjustment to know about. Operating cash flow from continuing operations was $607 million, about 78% of the $779 million of net income from continuing operations. The 74% fall is the $1,590 million Resideo payment in the prior-year quarter. The company's $688 million free cash flow adds back $158 million of separation-related payments, so free cash flow on the plain definition (operating cash flow minus $77 million of capital spending) was $530 million. Separation payments are real cash going out. Management expects about $0.5 billion of them for the full year.
  • Costs left out of segment profit are rising. Stock compensation, which counts against GAAP operating income but is left out of segment profit, rose to $104 million from $22 million. Divestiture-related costs in the reconciliation were $94 million against $25 million. Neither changes the picture of the quarter, but both widen the gap between segment profit and GAAP results.
  • Two other items. Discontinued operations lost $103 million this quarter, compared with $869 million of income attributable to Honeywell a year ago when Aerospace was still inside. The 10-Q also discloses that Honeywell is cooperating with a formal SEC investigation focused on "certain financial reporting matters," including its former Performance Materials and Technologies segment. The company does not expect a material effect.

Did last time's read hold up?

Our Q2 2026 analysis said the full-year margin guide required a second half above 21% segment margin, against 19.0% for the standalone business in Q2. It named three things that had to happen: Process Automation's catalyst aftermarket turning its 24% order growth into shipments; the PSS/WWS sales closing on schedule; and Johnson Matthey contributing without an integration drag. The margin target was met, at 21.3%, and both divestitures closed by August 3. Aftermarket sales did return to growth, at 4%. Johnson Matthey added sales but lowered Process Automation's margin, so that part was mixed. The concern that Q2's growth was all price also eased: volume added 2 points this quarter.

Guidance: raised again

Full-year 2026Previous (Q2)Current
Sales$19.8B–$20.0B$20.0B–$20.1B
Organic growth3%–4%4%–5%
Segment margin20.1%–20.5%~20.5%
Adjusted EPS$8.05–$8.35$8.40–$8.45
Operating cash flow~$2.1B~$2.1B
Free cash flow~$2.0B~$2.1B

Management now expects 5%–6% organic growth in Q4. Year to date, segment profit is $2,991 million on $15,004 million of sales, a 19.9% margin. By our arithmetic, about 20.5% for the year on $20.0–20.1 billion of sales implies Q4 sales of roughly $5.0–5.1 billion at a segment margin around 22%. That is above Q3's 21.3%. Without Aerospace, the company's new reported baseline is about $5 billion of sales a quarter.

Our view: the standalone company is growing faster than it was a quarter ago, and both the organic rate and the volume contribution improved. The margin story needs more care than the headline gives it. About 70% of this quarter's segment-profit gain came from removing corporate costs left over from the spin-offs. Once that saving is in the year-ago figures (from roughly Q3 2027), margin gains will have to come from the businesses. Of the three, Process Automation is going the wrong way on margin while it absorbs Johnson Matthey, and Industrial Automation's products were flat because utilities postponed meter installations. The Q4 numbers to watch are whether Process Automation's margin starts recovering from 22.2%, and whether the 5%–6% organic guide holds without utility meter demand returning.

Takeaway: Honeywell's first standalone quarter showed real growth: 7% organic, with volume finally contributing. But most of the 370-basis-point segment-margin jump came from $140 million of lower corporate overhead after the spin-offs, while the three businesses' own profit grew 5%. Adjusted EPS of $2.27 (+34%) is the fair number to use; GAAP EPS of $2.40 is distorted in both years by one-time gains and, this quarter, an unusually low tax rate.

More on Honeywell Technologies

More Honeywell Technologies reports

Read 0 community reports on Honeywell Technologies, or write your own.Write a report

Recent in Industrials