Moving iMage Technologies, Inc. (MITQ) FY2026 Earnings: Revenue $17M (-4.6%)
MITQ — FY2026 Annual Financial Report Analysis
Full Year · Fiscal year 2026 · Published by Pham Hop
Moving iMage Technologies cut its FY2026 net loss to $0.30M from $0.95M as gross margin rose to 29.1% on a 4.6% sales decline, but cash fell 44% to $3.19M after the $1.5M DCS speaker-line purchase and a supplier paydown.
Revenue
$17M
-4.6% YoY
Net income
-$297K
Diluted EPS
$-0.03
Operating margin
-2.9%
This period vs a year ago
Same period last year
This period
Revenue▼-4.6%
≈$18M
$17M
Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.
Fiscal 2026: a smaller loss on better margins, but cash fell 44% after the speaker-line purchase
Moving iMage Technologies sells and installs cinema equipment: its own products (projector pedestals, lighting and power controls, accessibility headsets, cup holders) plus third-party projectors, sound systems and screens for new and renovated theaters. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, sales fell 4.6% to $17.32 million, but the company kept more of each dollar it sold, so the net loss shrank from $948,000 to $297,000. The bigger story is the balance sheet. Cash dropped from $5.72 million to $3.19 million, mostly because the company bought QSC's Digital Cinema Speaker (DCS) product line for $1.5 million in inventory and paid down a large supplier balance.
At a glance
Gross margin 29.1%, up from 25.2%. Gross margin is the share of sales left after paying for the goods sold. Management puts the gain down to "product mix from selling higher margin products". That is the main reason the loss narrowed.
Cash down $2.52 million to $3.19 million. Operations used $2.47 million of cash, against $437,000 generated the year before. The company has no bank debt, but the cash cushion is now about $0.32 per share.
Backlog $6.96 million, down from $7.52 million. Backlog is signed orders not yet delivered and counted as sales. It is the company's best indicator of fiscal 2027 revenue, and it starts the year 7.4% lower.
The numbers
Metric
FY2026 (to Jun 30, 2026)
FY2025
YoY Change
Net sales
$17.32M
$18.15M
-4.6%
Gross profit
$5.03M
Read 0 community reports on Moving iMage Technologies, Inc., or write your own.Write a report
$4.57M
+10.0%
Gross margin
29.1%
25.2%
+3.9 pts
Operating expenses (R&D + selling + G&A)
$5.53M
$5.66M
-2.3%
Operating income (loss)
-$0.50M
-$1.09M
loss narrowed by $0.59M
Operating margin
-2.9%
-6.0%
+3.1 pts
Net income (loss)
-$0.30M
-$0.95M
loss narrowed by $0.65M
Diluted EPS
-$0.03
-$0.10
loss narrowed by $0.07
Operating cash flow
-$2.47M
+$0.44M
swung to outflow
Cash at year end
$3.19M
$5.72M
-44.1%
Backlog at year end
$6.96M
$7.52M
-7.4%
Percentage changes aren't shown for net loss and EPS because a percent change between two losses is easy to misread. In both lines the loss got smaller.
What drove the year
Sales slipped because there were fewer theater projects. The 10-K says revenue fell "primarily due to lower project revenues despite first-time DCS revenue additions." Nearly all revenue comes from shipping equipment: $17.14 million of the $17.32 million total, against $18.00 million a year earlier. Installation brought in only $131,000 and software/services $46,000. The company didn't disclose how much revenue the new DCS speaker line contributed. It started selling DCS in December 2025, so that line had about seven months of sales in the year. No customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in either year.
Margins did the work. Gross profit rose $459,000 on $830,000 less revenue. Cost of goods sold fell faster than sales, from $13.57 million to $12.29 million (-9.5%). Management's explanation is mix: more of the company's own higher-margin products and fewer pass-through third-party items. Its stated plan is to keep pushing its accessibility (ADA) translation system and direct-view LED screens, which it expects to carry "significantly higher margins".
Costs were trimmed, not cut deeply. Total operating expenses fell $129,000 (-2.3%). G&A (general and administrative costs, meaning head-office staff, legal, accounting) fell from $3.58 million to $3.47 million. Selling and marketing was flat at $1.87 million, although advertising was nearly eliminated ($4,000 vs $34,000). R&D fell from $203,000 to $186,000 "due to decreased compensation expense related to headcount reduction." The company had 25 full-time-equivalent employees at year end.
The DCS speaker acquisition. On October 31, 2025, the company bought QSC's Digital Cinema Speaker line: the product rights plus inventory, for $1.5 million in cash. Because it bought assets rather than a whole business, the entire price was booked as inventory. That makes the deal a working-capital bet. The money only comes back as those speakers sell.
What the headline numbers hide
Cash flow was much worse than the loss. Net loss was $297,000, but operations used $2.47 million of cash. The main drains were a $1.68 million drop in accounts payable (the company paid down what it owed suppliers; payables fell from $3.01 million to $1.33 million), a $439,000 build in inventory and a $355,000 rise in prepaid expenses. Part of this reverses last year: FY2025's $437,000 of operating cash came largely from payables rising $748,000 and inventory falling $744,000. Over the two years together, the business has consumed cash.
A one-off gain flatters the bottom line. "Other income" includes a $128,000 gain on "extinguishment of payables". Supplier balances that were written off and didn't have to be paid are counted as income. That item didn't exist last year. Without it, the net loss would have been about $425,000. Meanwhile, ordinary interest income fell from $138,000 to $73,000 as the cash balance shrank, and that will keep falling if cash does.
Inventory grew while sales fell, and much of it is reserved. Net inventory rose 16.7% to $2.41 million while sales fell 4.6%. Gross inventory before write-down reserves rose 36%, from $3.48 million to $4.73 million, almost all of it finished goods ($4.30 million vs $2.98 million). The reserve against slow-moving or obsolete stock rose from $1.41 million to $2.32 million, so about 49% of gross inventory is now reserved. The 10-K says the company "estimates that a significant amount of the purchased [DCS] inventory is slow moving and has accounted for it in the reserve calculation." The cash flow statement shows only a $95,000 inventory-reserve charge this year (vs $307,000 in FY2025), so most of the $904,000 reserve increase did not run through this year's expenses. The filing doesn't reconcile the two. The lower reserve charge also helped the gross margin: charges like this normally sit in cost of goods sold, and the year-on-year drop of $212,000 equals nearly half of the $459,000 gross-profit gain.
A line in management's commentary conflicts with the numbers. Management says selling, general and administrative expense fell partly due to "lower credit losses". But the cash flow statement shows a $62,000 provision for credit losses (expected bad debts) this year against a $142,000 release of the provision last year. On those figures, credit-loss expense went up by about $204,000.
Receivables fell faster than sales. This is a good sign. Accounts receivable dropped 23.9% to $1.11 million, which management attributes to lower fourth-quarter sales.
EPS moved only because of operations. The share count was essentially flat (9.94 million weighted shares vs 9.91 million), buybacks totalled $6,000, and there was no income tax either year. Buybacks, tax and interest did nothing to the EPS change.
Controls remain weak. For another year, management concluded that disclosure controls were not effective. It cites four material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting: the closing process, no formal documented accounting policies, segregation-of-duties issues and no formal review of journal entries. The auditor, Haskell & White, gave a clean opinion on the statements. As an emerging growth company, MITQ is not required to have the auditor test its controls.
Takeaway: The margin gains cut the operating loss by more than half, but the company paid for that year with 44% of its cash. It bought a speaker line whose inventory it already expects to sell slowly, and it paid down suppliers, while backlog fell. Fiscal 2027 depends less on margins and more on whether that DCS stock turns into sales before the $3.19 million cash cushion runs down.
Balance sheet in brief
The company carries no borrowings. Its only long-term liabilities are $918,000 of office and warehouse leases. Current assets of $7.23 million cover current liabilities of $3.19 million 2.3 times (1.8 times a year ago), but that ratio improved mainly because payables were paid off with cash. Shareholders' equity fell slightly, from $4.86 million to $4.61 million. Customer deposits (cash that theater customers pay upfront before delivery) fell from $1.10 million to $0.95 million, which matches the smaller backlog.
Outlook
The company gives no revenue or profit guidance. Management says existing cash and operating cash flow "will be sufficient to meet our projected capital needs for the foreseeable future". It also says that "based on 2026 losses, we will selectively invest in, or seek financing, to expand our operations". Any equity raise at this company's size would dilute existing shareholders, and its risk factors say it expects to issue more stock.
Our read of the trajectory: at a 29.1% gross margin and this year's $5.53 million expense base, the company needs roughly $1.7 million more annual sales (about 10% growth) just to break even at the operating line. It starts fiscal 2027 with $0.56 million less in backlog than it had a year ago. The DCS line is the swing factor. A full year of speaker sales could fill that gap, but the company's own large reserve against DCS stock suggests it doesn't expect much of that inventory to sell quickly. Three things to watch in the September-quarter 10-Q: DCS revenue if disclosed, whether operating cash flow stops draining now that the supplier paydown is done, and whether the cash balance stays above $3 million.
This is the first report we've published on MITQ, so there is no earlier outlook to check against.