Financial Report Insights

UNP — Q3 2026 Financial Report Analysis

Q3 · Fiscal year 2026 · Published by Pham Hop

Union Pacific's Q3 2026 EPS rose 16% to $3.49 on 15% higher revenue ($7.20B) as carloads grew 6%, with no help from buybacks or taxes; a 64% jump in diesel prices held the operating ratio to 59.1%, and on-time service indexes fell 6-7 points.

At a glance

  • Carloads +6%, the real driver. Volume grew in all three business groups, led by intermodal containers (+11%). Freight revenue excluding fuel surcharges (the extra charges that track diesel prices) grew 6%, versus 4% in Q2.
  • EPS +16% to $3.49, with no help from buybacks or taxes. Share count was flat and the tax rate rose to 23.8% from 22.9%. All of the gain came from running the railroad.
  • Reported operating ratio 59.1%, but fuel cost 1.4 points of it. Management says high fuel prices added 140 basis points (1.4 percentage points) to the ratio. Without that, the railroad got about a point more efficient.
Revenue
$7.2B
+15.3% YoY
Net income
$2.1B
+16.1% YoY
Diluted EPS
$3.49
+15.9% YoY
Operating margin
40.9%

This period vs a year ago

  • Same period last year
  • This period
Revenue+15.3%
≈$6.2B
$7.2B
Net income+16.1%
≈$1.8B
$2.1B
Diluted EPS+15.9%
≈$3.01
$3.49

Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.

How UNP compares with Industrials peers

  • UNP
  • Peer median
  • Each peer (hover for name)
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.3% · median +8.4% · 21st of 81
≤ -0.7%≥ +32.1%
Operating margin40.9% · median 17.9% · 3rd of 80
≤ 5.2%≥ 40.9%
EPS growth (YoY)+15.9% · median +13.4% · 35th of 79
≤ -27.7%≥ +92.3%

Rank 1 = fastest revenue growth, highest operating margin, fastest EPS growth. Peers are the other Industrials companies with a 2026 report on this site, each at its latest period we've analyzed; fiscal calendars differ, so periods are not always the same months.

Union Pacific, the largest railroad in the western US, earned $2.08 billion ($3.49 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2026, up 16%, on operating revenue of $7.20 billion, up 15%. Unlike last quarter, this was not mainly a fuel story. Revenue carloads (the number of loads hauled) rose 6%, up from 2% growth in Q2, and operating income rose 15%. Diesel was still very expensive at an average $4.21 a gallon, 64% more than a year ago, and that kept the railroad's main efficiency measure, the operating ratio, from improving much on paper: 59.1% versus 59.2%.

The quarter in numbers

The operating ratio is the standard railroad efficiency measure: operating expenses as a share of revenue. At 59.1%, 59.1 cents of every revenue dollar went to running the railroad (crews, fuel, maintenance, depreciation) and 40.9 cents was left as operating profit. Lower is better. The "operating margin" figure on this page is simply 100% minus the operating ratio.

MetricQ3 2026Q3 2025YoY Change
Operating revenue$7,197M$6,244M+15.3%
Freight revenue$6,813M$5,927M+14.9%
Freight revenue excl. fuel surchargen/an/a+6%
Operating income$2,943M$2,549M+15.5%
Operating ratio (GAAP)59.1%59.2%-0.1 pts (better)
Adjusted operating ratio58.8%58.5%+0.3 pts (worse)
Operating margin40.9%40.8%+0.1 pts
Net income$2,076M$1,788M+16.1%
Diluted EPS$3.49$3.01+15.9%
Adjusted diluted EPS$3.53$3.08+14.6%
Revenue carloads2.293M2.163M+6%
Average revenue per car$2,971$2,740+8%
Avg. fuel price per gallon$4.21$2.56+64%

The "adjusted" figures exclude merger-related costs for the pending Norfolk Southern acquisition ($22 million this quarter, $41 million a year ago).

Where the volume came from

Union Pacific groups its freight into three businesses. This quarter all three grew carloads or held them flat, which did not happen in Q2:

GroupFreight revenueYoYCarloadsYoY
Bulk (grain, fertilizer, food, coal)$2,116M+10%529Kflat
Industrial (chemicals, metals, forest, energy)$2,509M+14%606K+6%
Premium (autos, intermodal containers)$2,188M+21%1,158K+9%
  • Premium grew fastest. Intermodal (shipping containers and truck trailers moved by rail; each one counts as a carload) rose 11% in volume and 27% in revenue, to $1.52 billion. Revenue per intermodal unit rose 14% to $1,586. Automotive revenue rose 11% on 2% more carloads.
  • Industrial was the broadest gain. Metals & minerals carloads rose 8% and revenue 17%. Energy & specialized markets revenue rose 18% on 7% more carloads. Industrial chemicals & plastics revenue rose 8%.
  • Bulk revenue rose 10% on flat volume. Grain carloads rose 5% and revenue 11%. Coal carloads fell 3%, a much smaller drop than Q2's 14%, and coal revenue rose 12% as revenue per car rose 15%. Fertilizer carloads fell 5%.

Revenue per car rose in every single commodity line, by 6% to 15%. Part of that is fuel surcharges and part is price increases. The release does not split the two by commodity. At the total level, freight revenue rose 15% but only 6% excluding surcharges, which means more than 9 of the 15 points of freight revenue growth came from fuel surcharges.

Why costs rose 15%

Operating expenses rose $559 million to $4.25 billion:

  • Fuel: +$424 million (+69%). This is about three-quarters of the increase. The price per gallon rose 64%, while gallons used rose only 2% even though gross ton-miles (a measure of total work done) rose 4%. Fuel used per unit of work improved 2%, to 1.034 gallons per thousand gross ton-miles, a company record.
  • Compensation and benefits: +$50 million (+4%). Average headcount fell 1% to 28,540 while carloads rose 6%. Workforce productivity (car miles per employee) rose 5% to a record 1,219.
  • Purchased services and materials: +$63 million (+9%).
  • Depreciation: +$25 million (+4%).
  • Equipment rents: -$6 million (-3%) and Other: +$3 million (+1%).

Excluding fuel, operating expenses rose about $135 million (+4%), against 6% more carloads. That is the core efficiency gain the reported operating ratio hides.

Takeaway: This is the quarter where Union Pacific's growth stopped depending on diesel. Carloads rose 6% and freight revenue excluding fuel surcharges rose 6%, while non-fuel costs rose only about 4% and headcount fell. The reported operating ratio barely moved only because fuel prices added 1.4 points to it. EPS grew 16% with flat share count and a higher tax rate, so all of it came from the railroad itself.

What the headline numbers hide

Cash conversion is strong. Operating cash flow for the first nine months was $8.30 billion, 1.44 times net income of $5.77 billion, and up 18% from $7.07 billion. Free cash flow by the company's own definition (operating cash flow minus investing cash flow and dividends) rose 27% to $2.36 billion. Part of the cash went into short-term investments ($875 million at quarter end versus $250 million in December), and debt fell to $30.3 billion from $31.8 billion. Union Pacific's preferred leverage measure, adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA, fell to 2.4x from 2.7x.

The GAAP-to-adjusted gap is small and only merger costs. The only item excluded is $22 million of acquisition-related expense ($0.04 a share). Adjusted EPS grew 15% and reported EPS grew 16%; reported grew slightly faster because last year's merger costs ($41 million) were larger. The release notes some of these costs are not tax-deductible, so the tax line is unadjusted. Unlike Q2, no state tax benefit flattered this quarter.

None of the EPS growth came from buybacks, lower taxes or financial items. Diluted shares were 594.5 million versus 593.2 million, slightly higher. Buybacks are still paused: $26 million year to date, the same as at the end of June, so none in Q3, versus $2.68 billion in the first nine months of 2025. The effective tax rate rose to 23.8% from 22.9%, a headwind. Interest expense fell $15 million as debt came down, a small help. Pre-tax income rose 18%; the higher tax rate trimmed that to 16% at the net income line.

Service slipped noticeably as volume rose. The intermodal service performance index fell to 92% from 98%, and the manifest (mixed-freight carload) index fell to 93% from 100%. These measure how often shipments arrive as promised. Car velocity (+1% to 228 miles a day) and terminal dwell (-2% to 19.9 hours) still improved, so the network is not congested, but on-time performance for customers did weaken. The release does not explain the decline. In Q2 the company blamed a tougher comparison; the gap has now widened from 2-4 points to 6-7 points. CEO Jim Vena's statement that the railroad delivered "the service we sold" sits awkwardly next to those two figures.

Guidance quietly changed on two lines. Management still expects reported EPS growth in the "high-single digit" for 2026. But the operating-ratio goal moved from "operating ratio improvement" (Q2 wording) to "improvement from core business; reported operating ratio challenged by high fuel prices." Year to date, the reported ratio is 59.7% versus 59.6% last year, so a reported improvement for the full year is now unlikely and management is no longer promising it. The capital plan rose to $3.5 billion from $3.3 billion. The release does not say what the extra $200 million is for.

The full 10-Q is not filed yet, so the segment commentary, receivables detail and management's explanations for individual cost lines are not available. This analysis is based on the earnings release.

Did last time's read hold up?

Our Q2 report said to watch three things in Q3. Domestic intermodal offsetting coal: yes, and more. Intermodal carloads rose 11%, while the coal decline narrowed to 3% from 14%, so coal was barely a drag. Diesel near $3.86 a gallon: no, it rose further to $4.21, which is why the operating ratio still looks flat. The STB restarting the merger review: the release says only that the company looks forward to "the upcoming steps of the Surface Transportation Board's merger review process," without a date or ruling. We also estimated the second half needed about 9-10% EPS growth to hit the raised full-year target. Q3 delivered 16%, and nine-month reported EPS is up 9.5% ($9.71 vs $8.87), so the target is already in reach.

Merger status

Union Pacific's acquisition of Norfolk Southern (NSC) still needs approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the federal railroad regulator. This release gives no new procedural detail. Our Q2 report, based on the 10-Q, noted the application was accepted as complete in May 2026 and the proceeding was paused until supplemental information was filed in late July. The merger agreement includes a $2.5 billion termination fee in certain circumstances. Norfolk Southern's own Q3 results, released this week, also describe approval as pending. Merger costs at Union Pacific were $22 million in Q3 and $93 million year to date. For shareholders, the clearest effects so far are that buybacks remain on hold and cash is building up.

Outlook

Management's 2026 outlook ("on track with Investor Day targets"):

  • Reported EPS growth: "high-single digit" (affirmed). The company says this is consistent with its target of high-single to low-double digit annual EPS growth through 2027.
  • Pricing dollars above inflation dollars (affirmed).
  • Operating ratio: improvement from the core business; reported ratio "challenged by high fuel prices" (updated, softer than Q2's wording).
  • Capital spending of $3.5 billion (updated, up from $3.3 billion).
  • Continued annual dividend increases. The quarterly dividend is now $1.42, up 3% from $1.38.
  • The economic backdrop is still described as "mixed."

Our read: With nine-month EPS up 9.5%, the high-single-digit target looks safe unless Q4 volume falls sharply. The bigger question is whether 6% carload growth lasts. It came with weaker on-time service, and if customers notice the slip, intermodal growth, which competes most directly with trucks on reliability, could slow. Fuel is the other swing factor: it inflates revenue and costs by similar dollar amounts, so it barely hurts profit, but as long as diesel stays above $4 a gallon the reported operating ratio will look worse than the business is running. In Q4, watch whether the service indexes recover toward last year's levels, whether carload growth holds near 6% against an easier coal comparison, and whether the STB sets a schedule for the Norfolk Southern review.

More on Union Pacific Corporation

More Union Pacific Corporation reports

Read 0 community reports on Union Pacific Corporation, or write your own.Write a report

Recent in Industrials