WCN — Q3 2026 Financial Report Analysis
Q3 · Fiscal year 2026 · Published by Pham Hop
Waste Connections grew Q3 2026 revenue 7.3% to $2.64 billion on 5.5% price increases despite a 1.2% volume decline; adjusted EPS rose 9.7% to $1.58 and the full-year outlook was raised again.
At a glance
- Price +5.5%, volume −1.2%. Waste Connections raised prices on its existing solid waste customers by 5.5% ("core price") while the number of pickups and tons handled fell 1.2%. The business is growing by charging more, not by handling more.
- Oilfield waste revenue +18.8% to $212.9 million. E&P waste is now 8.1% of revenue, up from 7.3%, helped by new disposal capacity, a reopened facility and more drilling in Canada and the southern US.
- Full-year adjusted EBITDA outlook raised to ~$3.345 billion, from $3.33–3.34 billion in July. Adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, after removing one-off items, a rough gauge of the cash profit the operations generate. Q3 adjusted EBITDA was $895.8 million, 34.0% of revenue.
- Revenue
- $2.6B
- +7.3% YoY
- Net income
- $359M
- +25.5% YoY
- Diluted EPS
- $1.43
- +28.8% YoY
- Operating margin
- 20.5%
This period vs a year ago
- Same period last year
- This period
Year-ago figures (≈) are worked out from the growth rate the company reported. Each row has its own scale.
Overview
Waste Connections (WCN) collects household and business trash, runs landfills and transfer stations across 46 US states and six Canadian provinces, and also treats and disposes of oilfield waste (what the company calls E&P waste, from oil and gas exploration and production). In the third quarter of 2026 (July to September) revenue rose 7.3% to $2.638 billion. The growth came mainly from charging customers more: price increases and fuel surcharges added $153.4 million, while fewer collection pickups took $54.8 million away. Reported net income jumped 25.5% to $359.2 million, but most of that jump reflects a $60.1 million charge in the same quarter last year that did not repeat. On management's adjusted basis, which strips out such items, earnings per share rose 9.7% to $1.58. The company raised its full-year 2026 outlook for the second time this year and lifted its quarterly dividend by 10%.
Key figures
| Metric | Q3 2026 | Q3 2025 | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2,638.1M | $2,458.4M | +7.3% |
| Operating income | $541.7M | $439.6M | +23.2% |
| Operating margin | 20.5% | 17.9% | +2.6 pts |
| Net income | $359.2M | $286.3M | +25.5% |
| Diluted EPS (GAAP) | $1.43 | $1.11 | +28.8% |
| Adjusted EPS (non-GAAP) | $1.58 | $1.44 | +9.7% |
| Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) | $895.8M | $830.3M | +7.9% |
| Adjusted EBITDA margin | 34.0% | 33.8% | +0.2 pts |
| Core price (solid waste) | +5.5% | n/a | — |
| Unit volume (solid waste) | −1.2% | n/a | — |
| E&P waste revenue | $212.9M | $179.1M | +18.8% |
| Adjusted free cash flow (non-GAAP) | $386.9M | $384.6M | +0.6% |
Operating margin is the share of revenue left after running the business (including depreciation and write-downs), before interest and tax. Core price and unit volume are the company's own measures of growth at existing solid waste operations; it began reporting the price/volume split in this form in early 2026, so no year-ago comparison is given.
Where the $179.7 million of extra revenue came from
The 10-Q breaks down the year-over-year revenue increase line by line:
| Driver | Q3 2026 impact |
|---|---|
| Core price increases | +$123.7M |
| Surcharges (mostly fuel) | +$29.7M |
| Acquisitions closed in the past year | +$53.9M |
| E&P (oilfield) waste at existing sites | +$19.1M |
| Recycled commodity sales | +$7.4M |
| Landfill gas and other | +$6.6M |
| Lower collection volumes | −$54.8M |
| Weaker Canadian dollar | −$5.4M |
| Divestitures | −$0.5M |
Stripping out acquisitions and divestitures, revenue grew about 5.1% from the businesses the company already owned a year ago (our calculation from the figures above).
Volume is still shrinking, but less. The company says the volume losses came from fewer roll-off (large construction and industrial containers) and commercial pickups in its Eastern, Southern and Canada regions, partly offset by more tons arriving at landfills in its Central and Western regions. The CEO said unit volume improved 0.7 percentage points from the second quarter, led by landfill tonnage. Not all of the 5.5% price increase reaches the average bill: "yield", the change in average price per unit of service after customers leave, new business is won and the mix shifts, was 4.3%.
Oilfield waste is a growing swing factor. E&P revenue at sites the company already owned rose $19.1 million, which the 10-Q attributes to "increased disposal capacity from ongoing development, resumed operations at a facility that was suspended, increased drilling and production in our Canada and Southern segments and higher crude oil and natural gas prices." This business moves with oil and gas activity, so it is less predictable than household trash collection.
Recycling turned positive. Revenue from selling recycled material rose $7.4 million, "primarily attributable to higher prices for old corrugated cardboard." For the first nine months, recycling revenue is still down $6.6 million because cardboard and plastics prices were lower in the first half. Recycling is small (2.4% of revenue), and the company says a 10% drop in recycled commodity prices would cut revenue by about $17.8 million a year.
Regional performance
The company reports six geographic segments. Segment EBITDA margin is each region's profit before interest, tax, depreciation and write-downs, as a share of its revenue.
| Segment | Q3 2026 revenue | YoY | EBITDA margin Q3 2026 | Q3 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern | $548.8M | +13.1% | 35.0% | 32.6% |
| Western | $522.4M | +7.4% | 29.2% | 29.6% |
| Eastern | $451.2M | +2.4% | 26.5% | 27.5% |
| Central | $435.8M | +5.4% | 37.6% | 36.4% |
| MidSouth | $300.6M | +6.3% | 29.6% | 28.5% |
| Canada | $379.2M | +8.4% | 44.5% | 45.7% |
Southern led, with price increases, acquisitions and higher oilfield waste revenue from more drilling. Eastern was the weak spot: revenue grew only 2.4% because commercial, roll-off and post-collection (transfer and landfill) volumes all declined and recycling revenue fell, and its margin slipped a full point. Canada remains by far the most profitable region, helped by oilfield waste and landfill gas sales, though its margin dipped 1.2 points.
Costs: fuel up, insurance and labor down
Cost of operations rose 6.7%, a little slower than revenue, so it fell to 56.9% of revenue from 57.2%. Inside that:
- Diesel hurt. Higher fuel expense added 0.7 points to costs as a share of revenue. The 10-Q cites geopolitical events, including the Iran war, for higher diesel and fuel prices. The CEO described "a late quarter surge in diesel pricing." Fuel surcharges billed to customers (+$29.7 million) recovered part of it.
- Lower "risk management" costs helped. These costs (insurance and claims) fell $15.0 million, worth 0.7 points of margin. Management links this to record safety performance.
- Labor costs fell as a share of revenue (−0.6 points), which the company attributes to better employee retention.
Management says that, excluding the fuel squeeze and other swing items, underlying adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 50 basis points (0.5 percentage points).
What the headline numbers hide
- The 25.5% net income jump mostly reflects an easy comparison. Q3 2025 carried $60.1 million of "impairments and other operating items": a $30.4 million environmental liability at an operating facility and $25.4 million of contract and permit write-offs. This quarter that line was only $1.9 million. On management's adjusted basis, net income grew 7.2% ($398.9 million vs $372.1 million), roughly in line with revenue. The adjustments are amortization of acquired intangibles ($48.8 million), the impairments line, $3.0 million of deal costs and a small equity-award item, less their tax effect.
- A lower tax rate added to GAAP EPS. The effective tax rate fell to 20.4% from 23.6%. At last year's rate, Q3 net income would have been roughly $15 million lower, about $0.06 per share (our calculation).
- Buybacks did part of the work on EPS. Diluted share count fell 2.2% to 251.9 million after more than $1 billion of buybacks this year (cash paid for repurchases was $944.4 million through September in the cash-flow statement; the release puts year-to-date outlays at over $1 billion). That is why adjusted EPS rose 9.7% while adjusted net income rose 7.2%.
- Year-to-date GAAP results carry a big charge of their own. Through nine months, impairments total $139.9 million, mostly $132.0 million to raise estimated landfill closure and post-closure costs (the money needed to cap and monitor landfills after they fill up). Management excludes it from adjusted figures. It is non-cash for now, but these are real future costs.
- Cash conversion is good but free cash flow is flat. Operating cash flow was $691.9 million in the quarter, nearly twice net income, which is normal for a business with heavy depreciation. But adjusted free cash flow (operating cash less capital spending) was flat at $386.9 million, and for nine months it was $1,090.2 million vs $1,083.7 million, because capital spending rose 12.4% to $893.7 million (plus $56.2 million on undeveloped land).
- Debt is funding part of the payouts. Through nine months the company spent $944.4 million on buybacks, $265.5 million on dividends and $368.7 million on acquisitions, more than the free cash flow it generated. Debt rose to about $9.43 billion from $8.82 billion at the end of 2025, and interest expense rose 14.1% to $96.4 million after new note issues in March and August. Debt is about 2.8 times the full-year adjusted EBITDA outlook (our calculation), and shareholders' equity fell to $7.88 billion from $8.25 billion.
- Acquisitions contributed less than last year. Net of divestitures, acquisitions added $53.4 million of revenue this quarter vs $76.6 million in Q3 2025, so pricing at existing operations did more of the lifting. The company has closed deals worth about $130 million of annual revenue so far in 2026.
Guidance
The company raised its 2026 outlook again (it excludes acquisitions not yet closed):
| 2026 outlook | July 2026 | October 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.02–10.05B | ~$10.09B |
| Net income | $1.169–1.173B | ~$1.182B |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $3.33–3.34B | ~$3.345B |
| Operating cash flow | $2.63–2.68B | $2.64–2.69B |
| Adjusted free cash flow | $1.40–1.45B | $1.40–1.45B (unchanged) |
| Capital expenditures | ~$1.25B | ~$1.25B (unchanged) |
The CEO said the company is "firmly on track to exceed" this outlook. The new figures imply fourth-quarter revenue of about $2.52 billion and adjusted EBITDA of about $840 million, a margin near 33.3% (our calculation from the outlook minus nine-month results). Q4 is seasonally smaller than Q3.
Takeaway: Waste Connections is still growing almost entirely through pricing: a 5.5% price increase against a 1.2% volume decline, with margins held up by lower insurance and labor costs while diesel rose. The 25% GAAP profit jump overstates things; adjusted earnings grew about 7%, and buybacks plus a lower tax rate lifted per-share figures further. Free cash flow is flat this year, and debt rose to fund buybacks and acquisitions.
Outlook: what to watch
- Volume trend. Unit volume improved from Q2 but is still negative. If landfill tonnage keeps recovering while price stays above 5%, organic growth could improve in 2027. If price increases slow down before volumes recover, growth slows.
- Diesel and surcharges. The late-quarter fuel spike will weigh on Q4. The company buys about 12.6 million gallons in Q4, and its fixed-price contracts cover part of its annual fuel. Surcharges recover costs only with a lag.
- Oilfield waste and commodities. Both helped this quarter and both depend on oil, gas and cardboard prices the company doesn't control. Management names them as possible upside, which also means they could turn into a drag.
- Balance sheet. Flat free cash flow alongside record buybacks and rising debt is sustainable for now at under 3 times EBITDA, but further increases in interest costs would eat into EPS growth.